The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population
Abstract
Background and Aim: Although the prognosis for pancreatic cancer is generally poor, it is well known that the survival rate for resected pancreatic cancer is much higher than that for more conservative treatment. The importance of early detection is emphasized for resection of pancreatic cancer. Measurement of serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19‐9 has shown satisfactory sensitivity and predictive value in symptomatic patients, but no available data has been found on healthy asymptomatic subjects. Thus, the authors aimed to determine the clinical usefulness of CA 19‐9 as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic subjects. Methods: From December 1994 to November 2000, 70 940 asymptomatic persons visiting the Health Promotion Center at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, participated. All subjects underwent abdominal ultrasonography and serum CA 19‐9 measurement. The authors analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CA 19‐9 for detecting pancreatic cancer. Also, those subjects who had a serum CA 19‐9 level above the cut‐off value were followed up using a serial check of CA 19‐9, computed tomography, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Results: The number of subjects with a level of CA 19‐9 above the cutoff of 37 U/mL was 1063 (1.5%), including four cases diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The prevalence of pancreatic cancer over the age of 30 years is 13.66 per 100 000 population in Korea. Therefore, the sensitivity is 100% and the specificity 98.5%. However, the positive predictive value of CA 19‐9 for detecting pancreatic cancer is only 0.9% in the asymptomatic population. Conclusion: Mass screening for pancreatic cancer using CA 19‐9 levels in asymptomatic subjects is ineffective because of a very low positive predictive value, despite its high sensitivity and specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter
Luo, G., Jin, K., Deng, S., Cheng, H., Fan, Z., Gong, Y., Qian, Y., Huang, Q., Ni, Q., Liu, C., et al. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409 · Cited by 446
CA 19-9: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects
Scarà, S., Bottoni, P., & Scatena, R. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_15 · Cited by 351
Maher, T. M., Oballa, E., Simpson, J. K., Porte, J., Habgood, A., Fahy, W. A., Flynn, A., Molyneaux, P. L., Braybrooke, R., Divyateja, H., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30430-7 · Cited by 271
Molecular markers of early pancreatic cancer
Goggins, M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.19.711 · Cited by 214
O'Brien, D. P., Sandanayake, N. S., Jenkinson, C., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Apostolidou, S., Fourkala, E.-O., Camuzeaux, S., Blyuss, O., Gunu, R., Dawnay, A., et al. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0365 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- KIM, J., LEE, K. T., LEE, J. K., PAIK, S. W., RHEE, J. C., & CHOI, K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-186
- ISSN
- 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1746
- OpenAlex
- W1982821807
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03219.x
- The paper
- KIM, J., LEE, K. T., LEE, J. K., PAIK, S. W., RHEE, J. C., & CHOI, K. W. (2004). Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03219.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.