Cited by 200Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serum CA19-9 Is Significantly Upregulated up to 2 Years before Diagnosis with Pancreatic Cancer: Implications for Early Disease Detection

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic cancer are urgently needed. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether increased levels of serum CA19-9, CA125, CEACAM1, and REG3A are present before clinical presentation of pancreatic cancer and to assess the performance of combined markers for early detection and prognosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This nested case-control study within the UKCTOCS included 118 single and 143 serial serum samples from 154 postmenopausal women who were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 304 matched noncancer controls. Samples were split randomly into independent training and test sets. CA19-9, CA125, CEACAM1, and REG3A were measured using ELISA and/or CLIA. Performance of markers to detect cancers at different times before diagnosis and for prognosis was evaluated. RESULTS: At 95% specificity, CA19-9 (>37 U/mL) had a sensitivity of 68% up to 1 year, and 53% up to 2 years before diagnosis. Combining CA19-9 and CA125 improved sensitivity as CA125 was elevated (>30 U/mL) in approximately 20% of CA19-9-negative cases. CEACAM1 and REG3A were late markers adding little in combined models. Average lead times of 20 to 23 months were estimated for test-positive cases. Prediagnostic levels of CA19-9 and CA125 were associated with poor overall survival (HR, 2.69 and 3.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 and CA125 have encouraging sensitivity for detecting preclinical pancreatic cancer, and both markers can be used as prognostic tools. This work challenges the prevailing view that CA19-9 is upregulated late in the course of pancreatic cancer development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0365

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CA19-9 levels are elevated in blood samples collected before a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

    “Elevated concentrations of carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9), the only biomarker routinely used in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, have been shown in samples taken before diagnosis.76”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, D. P., Sandanayake, N. S., Jenkinson, C., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Apostolidou, S., Fourkala, E.-O., Camuzeaux, S., Blyuss, O., Gunu, R., Dawnay, A., Zaikin, A., Smith, R. C., Jacobs, I. J., Menon, U., Costello, E., Pereira, S. P., & Timms, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • 1Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Timms, John F.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2015-02-01
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
622-631
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2163459778
Cited by
200
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pancreatic Cancer UK (RG2014_01_PERERIA, 2011 Grant)
  • Cancer Research UK (A12790)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA084203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, CA19-9, CA125, CEACAM1, REG3A, serum tumor markers, early cancer detection, preclinical cancer, combined biomarker model, prognostic factors, overall survival, lead time, postmenopausal women
MeSH terms
Pancreatitis-Associated Proteins, Aged, Antigens, Neoplasm, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Humans, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Reproducibility of Results, Antigens, CD, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Up-Regulation, Case-Control Studies, CA-125 Antigen, CA-19-9 Antigen, Lectins, C-Type, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review