Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal profile of antibodies against SARS‐coronavirus in SARS patients and their clinical significance

Open access
MO, Hongying, ZENG, Guangqiao, REN, Xiaolan, LI, Hui, KE, Changwen, TAN, Yaxia, CAI, Chaoda, LAI, Kefang, CHEN, Rongchang, CHAN‐YEUNG, Moira, ZHONG, Nanshan·2006·Respirology

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a newly discovered disease caused by a novel coronavirus. The present study studied the longitudinal profile of antibodies against SARS‐coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) in SARS patients and evaluated the clinical significance of these antibodies. Methods: Two methods, ELISA and indirect immunofluorescent assay, were used for the detection of the anti‐SARS‐CoV IgG and IgM in 335 serial sera from 98 SARS patients. In 18 patients, serum antibody profiles were investigated and antibody neutralization tests were performed from 7 to 720 days after the onset of symptoms. Results: The ratios of positive IgG/IgM by ELISA were 0/0, 45.4/39.4, 88.6/71.4, 96/88, 100/48.6, 100/30.9, 100/17.1, 100/0 per cent, respectively, on 1–7, 8–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–60, 61–90, 91–180 and 181–720 days after the onset of symptoms. Antibodies were not detected within the first 7 days of illness, but IgG titre increased dramatically on day 15, reaching a peak on day 60, and remained high until day 180 from when it declined gradually until day 720. IgM was detected on day 15 and rapidly reached a peak, then declined gradually until it was undetectable on day 180. Neutralizing viral antibodies were demonstrated in the convalescence sera from SARS patients. Conclusion: The persistence of detectable IgG antibodies and neutralizing viral antibodies for up to 720 days suggest that SARS patients may be protected from recurrent SARS‐CoV infection for up to 2 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00783.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
MO, H., ZENG, G., REN, X., LI, H., KE, C., TAN, Y., CAI, C., LAI, K., CHEN, R., CHAN‐YEUNG, M., & ZHONG, N.
Venue
Respirology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
49-53
ISSN
  • 1323-7799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1843
OpenAlex
W2156368174
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal profile of antibodies against SARS‐coronavirus in SARS patients and their clinical significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00783.x
The paper
MO, H., ZENG, G., REN, X., LI, H., KE, C., TAN, Y., CAI, C., LAI, K., CHEN, R., CHAN‐YEUNG, M., & ZHONG, N. (2006). Longitudinal profile of antibodies against SARS‐coronavirus in SARS patients and their clinical significance. Respirology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00783.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.