Cited by 42Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

A randomized cross‐over study of auto‐continuous positive airway pressure versus fixed‐continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

Open access
TO, Kin W., CHAN, Wing C., CHOO, Kah L., LAM, Wai K., WONG, Kwan K., HUI, David S.·2008·Respirology

Abstract

Background and objectives: To compare the efficacy of auto‐CPAP (AutoSet Spirit, ResMed) versus fixed‐CPAP (S6 Elite, ResMed) in improving daytime sleepiness, health status, objective compliance and the ultimate treatment preference in patients with severe OSA. Methods: The study recruited 43 subjects aged 18–65 years with newly diagnosed severe OSA (AHI >30/h). Patients were initially treated with either auto‐CPAP or fixed‐CPAP for 2 months and then crossed over after a washout period of 1 week for another 2 months. Results: The study was completed by 41 patients. Results are presented as mean (SE). Use of auto‐CPAP in the first and the second month was significantly higher than that of fixed‐CPAP [129.7 (9.9) and 130.5 (10.7) h vs 115.2 (9.5) and 113.2 (9.4) h, P = 0.04 and 0.01], whereas mean hourly use per night was 4.3 and 4.4 h versus 3.8 and 3.7 h, respectively. The Epworth sleepiness scores improved after 1 month in both treatments (13.4 to 8.5 and 8.2, P < 0.01 for both). The Sleep apnoea quality of life index improved in the first month in both compared with baseline [4.6 (0.2) to 5.0 (0.2) for auto‐CPAP and 4.9 (0.2) for fixed‐CPAP, P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively], with no difference between the two treatments. Nine and 30 patients preferred auto‐CPAP and fixed‐CPAP, respectively, at the end of the trial, whereas 14 and 25 patients would have chosen the same treatments if cost had not been a consideration. Conclusions: Auto‐CPAP and fixed‐CPAP were equally effective in improving symptoms and health status in patients with severe OSA. Usage was higher with auto‐CPAP, but more patients ultimately chose fixed‐CPAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01138.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Hui DS, Ko FW, Chan JK, To KW, Fok JP et al. Sleep dis- ordered breathing and CPAP compliance in a group of commercial bus drivers in Hong Kong. Respirology 2006; 11: 723-30.
  2. [3]3. Stradling JR, Davies RJ. Sleep. 1: Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome: Definitions, epidemiol- ogy, and natural history. Thorax 2004; 59: 73-8.
  3. [14]14. Stradling JR, Barbour C, Pitson DJ, Davies RJ. Automatic nasal CPAP titration in the laboratory: Patient outcomes. Thorax 1997; 52: 72-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TO, K. W., CHAN, W. C., CHOO, K. L., LAM, W. K., WONG, K. K., & HUI, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • North District Hospital (HK)
Corresponding author
HUI, David S.
Venue
Respirology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 1323-7799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1843
OpenAlex
W2008031832
Cited by
42
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respirology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, auto-CPAP, medication adherence, daytime sleepiness, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, quality of life, treatment crossover
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Health Status, Hong Kong, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Cross-Over Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review