Cited by 19Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Retention of adolescents with substance dependence and coexisting mental health disorders in outpatient alcohol and drug group therapy

Pagey, Bronwyn, Deering, Daryle, Sellman, Doug·2010·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics that might enhance retention among adolescents attending outpatient alcohol and drug group therapy within a youth mental health setting. An important goal was to provide information for nurses and other clinicians who work with adolescents with coexisting substance use and mental health disorders. A retrospective file audit reviewed the files of 64 adolescents who attended a weekly alcohol and drug group between 2002 and 2004. Five characteristics were shown to have a significant impact on enhancing participant group retention. These were Māori and Pacific Island ethnicity, past or current legal charges, youth drug court (YDC) involvement, having a diagnosis of cannabis dependence, and a diagnosis of conduct disorder. Logistic regression found that YDC involvement on its own significantly predicted treatment retention. In an area of limited research, the findings from this study expand the literature on enhancing treatment retention for a vulnerable and hard‐to‐engage adolescent group with complex treatment needs, and highlight the need for further investigation of the potential role of the YDC. From a practice perspective, the findings support group therapy interventions as a cost‐effective treatment modality for assisting adolescents with coexisting substance use and mental health issues, including those with conduct disorder and YDC involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00693.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pagey, B., Deering, D., & Sellman, D.
Affiliations
  • Canterbury District Health Board (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Pagey, Bronwyn
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
437-444
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W1957813085
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canterbury District Health Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment retention, adolescents, substance use disorders, cannabis use disorder, conduct disorder, legal charges, child and adolescent mental health services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Outpatients, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Group, Retrospective Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review