Cited by 2Sleep and related disordersHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

Applicability of two brief evidence-based interventions to improve sleep quality in inpatient mental health care: APPLICABILITY OF SLEEP INTERVENTIONS

de Niet, Gerrit, Tiemens, Bea, van Achterberg, Theo, Hutschemaekers, Giel·2011·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

The present study explored the applicability of two brief evidence-based interventions to improve sleep quality in inpatient psychiatry. The study involved three comparable admission wards of a psychiatric hospital. Stimulus control was introduced at the first ward, and music-assisted relaxation at the second. At the third ward, no intervention was introduced. A mixed-method study was employed. We found that nurses share the opinion that both interventions can be applied, but patients are hard to motivate. They perceived the lack of available time, busyness at the ward, and the lack of cooperation of patients as the main obstacles. The perception of a successful implementation is correlated with the perception of gained attention for sleep problems, the perception of increased care options, and the impression of effectiveness. Qualitative data showed that the effectiveness of the interventions was compromised by operational issues, commitment issues, adaptation to contextual limitations, and conflicting individual beliefs. We concluded that music-assisted relaxation is applicable in inpatient psychiatry. The application of stimulus control met with insurmountable operational issues. The nursing team is a very important factor for the implementation of evidence-based interventions at ward level. The lack of a shared urge for change and responsibility for continuity are important factors contributing to failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00733.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Niet, G., Tiemens, B., van Achterberg, T., & Hutschemaekers, G.
Affiliations
  • Pro Persona (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
319-327
ISSN
1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1497529410
Cited by
0
References
18
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
sleep quality, psychiatric inpatient care, stimulus control, music-assisted relaxation, evidence-based interventions, implementation barriers, nurses' perceptions, patient motivation, sleep disorders
MeSH terms
Humans, Inpatients, Mental Health Services, Music Therapy, Psychiatric Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Relaxation Therapy, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review