Cited by 172Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and PoliticsMedia Studies and Communication

Negative versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988

Kaid, Lynda Lee, Johnston, Anne·1991·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Lynda Lee Kaid, Anne Johnston; Negative versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988, Journal of Communication, Volume

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02323.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
1991-09-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
53-64
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W2046560446
Cited by
172
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
negative advertising, positive advertising, television advertising, presidential campaigns, campaign advertising, political communication, political campaigns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review