CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Media Influence and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial Media and Politics

Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization

Open access
Lau, Richard R., Andersen, David J., Ditonto, Tessa M., Kleinberg, Mona S., Redlawsk, David P.·2017·Political Behavior
DOI 10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When multiple media sources are available, negative campaigning against one's political opponent - compared to positive campaigning for oneself - increases affective polarization.

    “when multiple media sources are available, negative campaigning against one’s political opponent — compared to positive campaigning for oneself — increases affective polarization290.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [290]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T. M., Kleinberg, M. S., & Redlawsk, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Lau, Richard R.
ORCID
Venue
Political Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
231-255
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
DOI
10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8
OpenAlex
W2489976074
Cited by
127
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
affective polarization, information search, selective exposure, 2012 presidential election, voter ideology, media selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review