The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving
Abstract
This article introduces the situational theory of problem solving (theory of problem solving) as an extended and generalized version of the situational theory of publics (theory of publics). The theory of problem solving introduces a new concept, communicative action in problem solving, as its dependent variable. To explain communicative action, the theory of problem solving refines the independent variables of the theory of publics: problem recognition, constraint recognition, involvement recognition, and referent criterion. Finally, it introduces a new variable: situational motivation in problem solving. The new motivational variable mediates the effects of antecedent perceptual variables on communicative behavior. We report the supporting evidence for theoretical propositions of the new theory based on structural equation modeling (SEM) testing using survey data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Cited by
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9 · Cited by 831
Kim, H. K., Ahn, J., Atkinson, L., & Kahlor, L. A. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020959670 · Cited by 313
Vrdelja, M., Vrbovšek, S., Klopčič, V., Dadaczynski, K., & Okan, O. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18168507 · Cited by 90
Internal communication for employee enablement: Strategies in American and Italian companies
Mazzei, A. (2014) · Corporate Communications: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ccij-08-2012-0060 · Cited by 78
Social media dialogues in a crisis: A mixed-methods approach to identifying publics on social media
Smith, B. G., Smith, S. B., & Knighton, D. (2018) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.005 · Cited by 78
The Impact of Affect on the Perception of Fake News on Social Media: A Systematic Review
Ali Adeeb, R., & Mirhoseini, M. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12120674 · Cited by 45
Jeong, J.-S., & Kim, S. Y. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2166698 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J.-N., & Grunig, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-149
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994089518
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 60.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
