Cited by 208Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Site-specific effects of tau phosphorylation on its microtubule assembly activity and self-aggregation

Open access
Liu, Fei, Li, Bin, Tung, E‐Jan, Grundke‐Iqbal, Inge, Iqbal, Khalid, Gong, Cheng‐Xin·2007·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Microtubule‐associated protein tau is abnormally hyperphosphorylated and aggregated into neurofibrillary tangles in brains with Alzheimer's disease. The phosphorylation sites of tau are mainly localized in the proline‐rich (residues 172–251) and C‐terminal tail (residues 368–441) regions, which flank the microtubule‐binding repeats. Here, we investigated the effects of tau phosphorylation at these distinct sites/regions on its activity of stimulating microtubule assembly and its self‐aggregation. We found that tau phosphorylation at the proline‐rich region by dual‐specificity tyrosine‐phosphorylated and ‐regulated kinase 1A inhibited its microtubule assembly activity moderately and promoted its self‐aggregation slightly. Tau phosphorylation at the C‐terminal tail region by glycogen synthase kinase‐3β increased its activity and promoted its self‐aggregation markedly. Tau phosphorylation at both regions plus the microtubule‐binding region by cAMP‐dependent protein kinase diminished its activity (∼70% inhibition) and disrupted microtubules. These studies reveal the differential regulation of tau's biological activity and self‐aggregation by phosphorylation at various sites/regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05955.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, F., Li, B., Tung, E., Grundke‐Iqbal, I., Iqbal, K., & Gong, C.
Affiliations
  • Nantong University (CN)
  • New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (US)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
3429-3436
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1927347955
Cited by
208
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 019158, R01AG019158, AG027429, R01AG027429)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau protein, tau phosphorylation, microtubule assembly, self-aggregation, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, proline-rich region, C-terminal tail, DAPK1, glycogen synthase kinase-3β, protein kinase A, microtubule-binding region
MeSH terms
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta, Dyrk Kinases, Animals, Humans, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Proline, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Recombinant Proteins, 3T3 Cells, tau Proteins, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review