Cited by 283Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Autophagic-lysosomal perturbation enhances tau aggregation in transfectants with induced wild-type tau expression

Hamano, Tadanori, Gendron, Tania F., Causevic, Ena, Yen, Shu‐Hui, Lin, Wen‐Lang, Isidoro, Ciro, DeTure, Michael, Ko, Li‐wen·2008·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The intracellular assembly of tau aggregates is a pathological hallmark shared by Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders known collectively as tauopathies. To model how tau fibrillogenesis evolves in tauopathies, we previously established transfectant M1C cultures from human neuroblastoma BE(2)‐M17D cells that inducibly express human tau. In the present study, these cells were used to determine the role of the autophagic‐lysosomal system in the degradation and aggregation of wild‐type tau. Tau induction for 5 days led to the accumulation of tau with nominal assembly of tau aggregates within cells. When the lysosomotropic agent, chloroquine (CQ), was added following the termination of tau induction, tau clearance was delayed. Decreased tau truncation and increased levels of intact tau were observed. When present during tau induction, CQ led to tau accumulation and promoted the formation of sarkosyl‐insoluble aggregates containing both truncated and full‐length tau. CQ treatment significantly decreased the activities of cathepsins D, B and L, and the inhibition of cathepsins B and L mimicked the effect of CQ and increased tau levels in cells. Additionally, exposure of cells to the autophagy inhibitor, 3‐methyladenine, led to tau accumulation and aggregation. These results suggest that the autophagic‐lysosomal system plays a role in the clearance of tau, and that dysfunction of this system results in the formation of tau oligomers and insoluble aggregates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06084.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamano, T., Gendron, T. F., Causevic, E., Yen, S., Lin, W., Isidoro, C., DeTure, M., & Ko, L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1119-1130
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2085939493
Cited by
283
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Fukui
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 17216, P01AG017216)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS48052, R01NS048052)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau aggregation, autophagy, lysosomal degradation, tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, chloroquine, cathepsins, 3-methyladenine, tau truncation, sarkosyl-insoluble tau, lysosomotropic agents
MeSH terms
Autophagy, Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Lysosomes, Protein Binding, Transfection, tau Proteins, Tauopathies, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review