The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Musical experience and neural efficiency – effects of training on subcortical processing of vocal expressions of emotion
Abstract
Musicians exhibit enhanced perception of emotion in speech, although the biological foundations for this advantage remain unconfirmed. In order to gain a better understanding for the influences of musical experience on neural processing of emotionally salient sounds, we recorded brainstem potentials to affective human vocal sounds. Musicians showed enhanced time‐domain response magnitude to the most spectrally complex portion of the stimulus and decreased magnitude to the more periodic, less complex portion. Enhanced phase‐locking to stimulus periodicity was likewise seen in musicians’ responses to the complex portion. These results suggest that auditory expertise engenders both enhancement and efficiency of subcortical neural responses that are intricately connected with acoustic features important for the communication of emotional states. Our findings provide the first biological evidence for behavioral observations indicating that musical training enhances the perception of vocally expressed emotion in addition to establishing a subcortical role in the auditory processing of emotional cues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 · Cited by 9,538
Johnson, M. H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1766 · Cited by 969
Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns
Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1872 · Cited by 954
Self-citationDeficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders
Russo, N. M., Skoe, E., Trommer, B., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Bradlow, A., & Kraus, N. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108 · Cited by 223
Self-citation
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationAuditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
Self-citationWhy would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis
Patel, A. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142 · Cited by 703
Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG
Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11070 · Cited by 389
How musical training affects cognitive development: rhythm, reward and other modulating variables
Miendlarzewska, E. A., & Trost, W. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00279 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Strait, D. L., Kraus, N., Skoe, E., & Ashley, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 661-668
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2152734555
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Musical experience and neural efficiency – effects of training on subcortical processing of vocal expressions of emotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06617.x
- The paper
- Strait, D. L., Kraus, N., Skoe, E., & Ashley, R. (2009). Musical experience and neural efficiency – effects of training on subcortical processing of vocal expressions of emotion. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06617.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.