The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual-vestibular cue integration for heading perception: applications of optimal cue integration theory
Open accessAbstract
The perception of self-motion is crucial for navigation, spatial orientation and motor control. In particular, estimation of one's direction of translation, or heading, relies heavily on multisensory integration in most natural situations. Visual and nonvisual (e.g., vestibular) information can be used to judge heading, but each modality alone is often insufficient for accurate performance. It is not surprising, then, that visual and vestibular signals converge frequently in the nervous system, and that these signals interact in powerful ways at the level of behavior and perception. Early behavioral studies of visual-vestibular interactions consisted mainly of descriptive accounts of perceptual illusions and qualitative estimation tasks, often with conflicting results. In contrast, cue integration research in other modalities has benefited from the application of rigorous psychophysical techniques, guided by normative models that rest on the foundation of ideal-observer analysis and Bayesian decision theory. Here we review recent experiments that have attempted to harness these so-called optimal cue integration models for the study of self-motion perception. Some of these studies used nonhuman primate subjects, enabling direct comparisons between behavioral performance and simultaneously recorded neuronal activity. The results indicate that humans and monkeys can integrate visual and vestibular heading cues in a manner consistent with optimal integration theory, and that single neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal area show striking correlates of the behavioral effects. This line of research and other applications of normative cue combination models should continue to shed light on mechanisms of self-motion perception and the neuronal basis of multisensory integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The behavioral and perceptual benefits of multisensory integration have been shown to be quite impressive and to confer a highly degree of adaptive benefit (Calvert et al., 2004; Fetsch et al., 2010; Murray and Wallace, 2012; Stein and Meredith, 1993; Stevenson et al., 2014a)”
From Behavioral, Perceptual, and Neural Alterations in Sensory and Multisensory Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Fetsch et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Ingleby, D. (1967) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(67)90197-6 · Cited by 8,616
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844 · cited 4×
“However, in many cases the prior is assumed to be approximately uniform (e.g., Ernst & Banks, 2002; Alais & Burr, 2004; Hillis et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPerception of the Visual World
(1952) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1952.01700030123016 · Cited by 3,748
The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation
Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 · Cited by 2,588 · cited 3×
“…estimate is simply the sum of the individual cue reliabilities: 1 r2AB ¼ 1 r2A þ 1 r2B ; or r2AB ¼ r2Ar 2 B r2A þ r2B ð4Þ A distinct but related approach uses Bayes’ rule to define optimal cue integration (for reviews see Yuille & Bülthoff, 1996; Mamassian et al., 2002; Knill & Pouget, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodBayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02169 · Cited by 2,004 · cited 1×
“…for behavioral performance by incorporating top-down expectations or biases about the stimuli, whether they are learned during the course of a task (Körding & Wolpert, 2004) or otherwise established during development or through life experience (e.g., Weiss et al., 2002; Stocker & Simoncelli,…”
BackgroundThe analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Britten, K., Shadlen, M., Newsome, W., & Movshon, J. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-12-04745.1992 · Cited by 1,958 · cited 2×
“To quantify neuronal sensitivity in a manner similar to behavior, we used signal detection theory (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis; Green & Swets, 1966; Bradley et al., 1987; Britten et al., 1992) to generate neurometric functions for each cell in the three stimulus conditions.”
MethodThe Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration
Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029 · Cited by 1,936 · cited 4×
“However, in many cases the prior is assumed to be approximately uniform (e.g., Ernst & Banks, 2002; Alais & Burr, 2004; Hillis et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian inference with probabilistic population codes
Ma, W. J., Beck, J. M., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1790 · Cited by 1,457
Blake, R., & Howard, I. P. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422197 · Cited by 1,121 · cited 3×
“Vection refers to an illusory percept of self-motion induced by visual motion (Mach, 1875; Brandt et al., 1972; Berthoz et al., 1975; Dichgans & Brandt, 1978; Howard, 1982).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Guedry F.E., 1974, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, The Vestibular System, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baum, S. H., Stevenson, R. A., & Wallace, M. T. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.007 · Cited by 370
“The behavioral and perceptual benefits of multisensory integration have been shown to be quite impressive and to confer a highly degree of adaptive benefit (Calvert et al., 2004; Fetsch et al., 2010; Murray and Wallace, 2012; Stein and Meredith, 1993; Stevenson et al., 2014a).”
BackgroundSerino, A. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.016 · Cited by 304
“, vision (Fetsch et al., 2010), audition, somatosensation (Lopez et al.”
Fetsch, C. R., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3503 · Cited by 322
Stanney, K. M., Lawson, B. D., Rokers, B., Dennison, M., Fidopiastis, C., Stoffregen, T. A., Weech, S., & Fulvio, J. M. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1828535 · Cited by 280
Closed-Form Solution of Visual-Inertial Structure from Motion
Martinelli, A. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0647-7 · Cited by 142
“, the visual-inertial SFM problem (from now on the Vi-SfM problem), has particular interest and has been investigated by many disciplines, both in the framework of computer science Bryson and Sukkarieh (2008), Jones and Soatto (2011), Kelly and Sukhatme (2011), Martinelli (2012), Strelow and Singh (2004) and in the fr…”
Cybersickness: a Multisensory Integration Perspective
Gallagher, M., & Ferrè, E. R. (2018) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-20181293 · Cited by 151
“Several results suggest that a process based on dynamic sensory reweighting may be important to explain cybersickness and adaptation to virtual environments (Butler et al. 2010; de Winkel et al. 2010; Fetsch et al. 2010; Angelaki et al. 2011).”
BackgroundFunctional Specializations of the Ventral Intraparietal Area for Multisensory Heading Discrimination
Chen, A., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4522-12.2013 · Cited by 132
“Previous studies have suggested a role for MSTd in multisensory heading perception (for reviews, see Angelaki et al., 2009; 2011; Fetsch et al., 2010).”
BackgroundGu, Y., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5154-11.2012 · Cited by 133
“However, the most thoroughly studied area is the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) (Britten, 2008; Angelaki et al., 2009; Fetsch et al., 2010).”
Current perspectives and methods in studying neural mechanisms of multisensory interactions
Klemen, J., & Chambers, C. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.015 · Cited by 120
A review of human sensory dynamics for application to models of driver steering and speed control
Nash, C., Cole, D. J., & Bigler, R. S. (2016) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-016-0682-x · Cited by 114
“Near-optimalBayesian integration of visual and vestibular information has been measured in several studies (Gu et al. 2008; Butler et al. 2010; Fetsch et al. 2009; Prsa et al. 2012; Drugowitsch et al. 2014; Fetsch et al. 2010).”
BackgroundStatistically Optimal Multisensory Cue Integration: A Practical Tutorial
Rohde, M., van Dam, L. C. J., & Ernst, M. O. (2015) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002510 · Cited by 119
Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances
Campos, J. L., Butler, J. S., & Bülthoff, H. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3048-1 · Cited by 108
Gamer's Health Guide: Optimizing Performance, Recognizing Hazards, and Promoting Wellness in Esports
Emara, A. K., Ng, M. K., Cruickshank, J., Kampert, M., Piuzzi, N. S., Schaffer, J. L., & King, D. (2020) · Current Sports Medicine Reports · doi:10.1249/jsr.0000000000000787 · Cited by 102
Chen, A., Gu, Y., Liu, S., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2485-15.2016 · Cited by 100
“Neural selectivity for heading has been described extensively in the dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) area, where many neurons show heading tuning in response to both inertial motion and optic flow (Duffy, 1998; Bremmer et al., 1999; Gu et al., 2006; Britten, 2008; Fetsch et al., 2010; Angelaki et al., 2011).”
BackgroundVentre‐Dominey, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00053 · Cited by 94
“…neurons in MSTd respond during vestibular stimulation in the dark and can display the same or opposite tuning for direction of motion in both visual and vestibular modalities, suggesting multimodal interactions in encoding heading (Bremmer et al., 1999; Gu et al., 2006; Fetsch et al., 2007, 2010).”
BackgroundImpact Prediction by Looming Visual Stimuli Enhances Tactile Detection
Cléry, J. C., Guipponi, O., Odouard, S., Wardak, C., & Hamed, S. B. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3031-14.2015 · Cited by 101
“The Bayesian framework has proven extremely successful in accounting for the behavioral (Fetsch et al., 2010) and single-cell recording (Gu et al.”
BackgroundMethodNoel, J., Blanke, O., & Serino, A. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13867 · Cited by 80
Britton, Z., & Arshad, Q. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00063 · Cited by 79
“, the weight of each cue is proportional to its reliability (1/variance) (171).”
BackgroundPerceptual precision of passive body tilt is consistent with statistically optimal cue integration
Lim, K., Karmali, F., Nicoucar, K. G., & Merfeld, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00073.2016 · Cited by 75
“…some earlier threshold studies have investigated optimal integration by degrading the precision of one or more of the cues (Ernst and Banks 2002; Fetsch et al. 2010), we chose to vary frequency as for our earlier threshold study that investigated optimal integration of visual and vestibular…”
InfluentialThe balance of feelings: Vestibular modulation of bodily sensations
Ferrè, E. R., Bottini, G., Iannetti, G. D., & Haggard, P. (2012) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.01.012 · Cited by 69
“Therefore, vestibular influences on somatosensation do not seem to act as an additional informative input contributing to multisensory integration (Fetsch et al., 2010).”
Karmali, F., Lim, K., & Merfeld, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00332.2013 · Cited by 70
Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing
Fister, J. K., Stevenson, R. A., Nidiffer, A. R., Barnett, Z. P., & Wallace, M. T. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.016 · Cited by 68
“…2010; Beierholm et al., 2009; Besson et al., 2010; Charbonneau et al., 2013; Clemens et al., 2011; Deneve and Pouget, 2004; Ernst and Banks, 2002; Fetsch et al., 2010, 2012, 2009; Helbig et al., 2012; Ma and Pouget, 2008; Nath and Beauchamp, 2011; Noppeney et al., 2010; Rohe and Noppeney, 2015).”
BackgroundGu, Y., Cheng, Z., Yang, L., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv183 · Cited by 62
Motion Perception: From Detection to Interpretation
Nishida, S., Kawabe, T., Sawayama, M., & Fukiage, T. (2018) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034328 · Cited by 60
Campos, J. L., Butler, J. S., & Bülthoff, H. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4011-0 · Cited by 57
Stapleton, J., Setti, A., Doheny, E. P., Kenny, R. A., & Newell, F. N. (2013) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3750-7 · Cited by 57
Computational Characterization of Visually Induced Auditory Spatial Adaptation
Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2011) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00075 · Cited by 58
“…numerosity judgment (Shams et al., 2005; Bresciani et al., 2006; Wozny et al., 2008), rate perception (Roach et al., 2006), oddity perception (Fetsch et al., 2009, 2010; Butler et al., 2010), angular displacement (Jürgens and Becker, 2006), gravitoinertial force discrimination (Macneilage et…”
BackgroundOptimal visual–vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles
Butler, J. S., Campos, J. L., & Bülthoff, H. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4136-1 · Cited by 56
Kayser, S. J., Philiastides, M. G., & Kayser, C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.010 · Cited by 51
“…by simultaneous sounds (Alais and Burr, 2004; Beer and Roder, 2004; Lewis and Noppeney, 2010; Schmiedchen et al., 2012) or vestibular information (Fetsch et al., 2010; Gu et al., 2008), even so when the multisensory stimulus is not directly task relevant (Gleiss and Kayser, 2014b; Kim et al.,…”
Binding body and self in visuo‐vestibular conflicts
Macauda, G., Bertolini, G., Palla, A., Straumann, D., Brugger, P., & Lenggenhager, B. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12809 · Cited by 51
“Visuo-vestibular cue integration is essential for self-motion, motor control and spatial orientation and hence for the interaction with our environment (for a review see Fetsch et al., 2010) and the demarcation of self from non-self (Lopez, 2013).”
BackgroundFunctional neuroimaging of visuo-vestibular interaction
Roberts, E., Ahmad, H., Arshad, Q., Patel, M., Dima, D., Leech, R., Seemungal, B. M., Sharp, D. J., & Bronstein, A. M. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1344-4 · Cited by 46
“(Duffy 1998; Gu et al. 2006; Fetsch et al. 2010), a recent inactivation study in macaques provided causal evidence that MSTd is dominant for visual heading direction thresholds; VPS and parieto-insular vestibular cortex (PIVC) areas are dominant for vestibular signals, but inactivation of VPS had no functional consequ…”
Eye-Centered Representation of Optic Flow Tuning in the Ventral Intraparietal Area
Chen, X., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2837-13.2013 · Cited by 45
“…flow and vestibular signals related to self-translation occurs in both the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd; Gu et al., 2006, 2008, 2012; Fetsch et al., 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012; Chen et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2011) and the ventral intraparietal area (VIP; Bremmer et al., 2002a,b, 2005,…”
BackgroundForced Fusion in Multisensory Heading Estimation
de Winkel, K. N., Katliar, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127104 · Cited by 50
“The cortical area currently considered the most likely site of convergence of visual-vestibular heading information is the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) [6, 7], as neurons at this site have been shown to respond to optic flow patterns suggesting self-motion [8–14] as well as to translation in absence of…”
BackgroundYakubovich, S., Israeli‐Korn, S., Halperin, O., Yahalom, G., Hassin‐Baer, S., & Zaidel, A. (2020) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa035 · Cited by 46
Impaired Tilt Perception in Parkinson’s Disease: A Central Vestibular Integration Failure
Bertolini, G., Wicki, C. A., Baumann, C. R., Straumann, D., & Palla, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124253 · Cited by 40
Visual-inertial structure from motion: Observability and resolvability
Martinelli, A. (2013) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696963 · Cited by 38
“…i.e., the visual-inertial structure from motion problem (from now on the Vi-SfM problem), has particular interest and has been investigated by many disciplines, both in the framework of computer science [2], [12], [13], [20], [23] and in the framework of neuroscience (e.g., [1], [5], [8]).”
BackgroundIs “Circling” Behavior in Humans Related to Postural Asymmetry?
Bestaven, E., Guillaud, É., & Cazalets, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043861 · Cited by 35
“Most of the studies that have addressed walking in blindfolded subjects, however, have been focused on pathintegration or orientation towards a visual target presented prior to initiating movement, or reproduction of a recently performed route [33,34,35,36].”
BackgroundRelationship between vestibular sensitivity and multisensory temporal integration
Shayman, C. S., Seo, J., Oh, Y., Lewis, R. F., Peterka, R. J., & Hullar, T. E. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00379.2018 · Cited by 34
“…integration has been studied by providing motion and other sensory cues that are either congruent or conflicting and determining how much weight the brain places on each cue to form an overall estimate of head orientation or movement in the environment (Fetsch et al. 2010; McCollum et al. 1996).”
BackgroundPrimate extrastriate cortical area MST: a gateway between sensation and cognition
Wild, B., & Treue, S. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00384.2020 · Cited by 35
On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account
Kirsch, W., & Kunde, W. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221096138 · Cited by 34
Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation
Newman, P. M., Qi, Y., Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02254-w · Cited by 29
“…levels (e.g., Alais & Burr, 2004; Battaglia et al., 2003; Butler et al., 2010; Butler et al., 2011; Camors et al., 2015; Ernst & Banks, 2002; Girshick & Banks, 2009; Hillis et al., 2004; Jacobs, 1999; Koppen et al., 2019) and neural levels (e.g., Fetsch et al., 2010, 2013) during perceptual tasks.”
A wayfinding aid to increase navigator independence
Waters, W., & Winter, S. (2011) · Journal of Spatial Information Science · doi:10.5311/josis.2011.3.43 · Cited by 30
“This involves monitoring sensory flow (mostly from proprioception, vision, and audition) to update rotation and translation of the body relative to the starting point [17].”
BackgroundNash, C., & Cole, D. J. (2019) · Vehicle System Dynamics · doi:10.1080/00423114.2019.1589536 · Cited by 29
Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception
Shayman, C. S., Peterka, R. J., Gallun, F. J., Oh, Y., Chang, N.-Y. N., & Hullar, T. E. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00307.2019 · Cited by 27
Inference of perceptual priors from path dynamics of passive self-motion
Prsa, M., Jimenez-Rezende, D., & Blanke, O. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00755.2014 · Cited by 28
“These novel findings extend previous demonstrations that vestibular cues pertaining to self-motion perception are processed according to statistical optimality (Butler et al. 2010; Fetsch et al. 2010; Laurens and Droulez 2007; MacNeilage et al. 2008; Prsa et al. 2012; Vingerhoets et al. 2009).”
BackgroundDynamics of individual perceptual decisions
Merfeld, D. M., Clark, T. K., Lu, Y. M., & Karmali, F. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00225.2015 · Cited by 27
“…a number of studies suggest that the brain optimally processes this information (Borah et al. 1988; Butler et al. 2010; de Winkel et al. 2010; Fetsch et al. 2009, 2010, 2011; Gu et al. 2008; Jurgens and Becker 2006; Karmali et al. 2014; Karmali and Merfeld 2012; Laurens and Droulez 2007;…”
BackgroundA Rational Analysis of the Acquisition of Multisensory Representations
Yildirim, I., & Jacobs, R. A. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01216.x · Cited by 28
A conceptual model of the visual control of posture
Bronstein, A. M. (2019) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.023 · Cited by 26
Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory
Newman, P. M., & McNamara, T. P. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01581-8 · Cited by 26
Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status
Maitre, J., & Paillard, T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162966 · Cited by 24
Observability Properties and Deterministic Algorithms in Visual-Inertial Structure from Motion
Martinelli, A. (2012) · Foundations and Trends in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000030 · Cited by 21
Heading perception depends on time-varying evolution of optic flow
Burlingham, C. S., & Heeger, D. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2022984117 · Cited by 22
Frissen, I., Campos, J. L., Sreenivasa, M., & Ernst, M. O. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8432-6_6 · Cited by 22
Merriman, N. A., Roudaia, E., Romagnoli, M., Orvieto, I., & Newell, F. N. (2018) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1462402 · Cited by 23
“…involves a complex process that relies on the optimal integration of information from the visual, vestibular, proprioceptive, and auditory modalities (Angelaki and Cullen 2008; Chang, Uchanski, and Hullar 2012; Fetsch et al. 2009; Fetsch, DeAngelis, and Angelaki 2010; Lord and Sturnieks 2005).”
BackgroundInterhemispheric control of sensory cue integration and self-motion perception
Arshad, Q., Ortega, M. C., Goga, U., Lobo, R., Siddiqui, S., Mediratta, S., Bednarczuk, N. F., Kaski, D. N., & Bronstein, A. M. (2019) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.04.027 · Cited by 22
“Much of the research that is currently available which addresses how sensory cues are integrated to inform heading perception has been conducted in primates (Gu et al., 2007; Morgan et al., 2008; Angelaki et al., 2009; Fetsch et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2011; Cullen, 2012; Fetsch et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2017).”
Hong, F., Badde, S., & Landy, M. S. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008877 · Cited by 23
Reduced Vision Selectively Impairs Spatial Updating in Fall-prone Older Adults
Barrett, M. M., Doheny, E. P., Setti, A., Maguinness, C., Foran, T. G., Kenny, R. A., & Newell, F. N. (2013) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002412 · Cited by 20
“In order to optimally combine different information from across these sensory systems, the reliability of the inputs must be ascertained (Cheng et al., 2007; Deneve and Pouget, 2004; Fetsch et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFinding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation
Jetzschke, S., Ernst, M. O., Froehlich, J., & Boeddeker, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00132 · Cited by 21
“…et al., 2014;Wystrach et al., 2015; Fleischmann et al., 2016) and evidence from landmark navigation studies in pigeons (Sutton, 2002; Blaisdell and Cook, 2005; Cheng et al., 2006) or cue integration inmonkeys (Fetsch et al., 2010; Dokka et al., 2015) also indicates close to optimal cue integration.”
BackgroundInfluentialCrossmodal Integration Improves Sensory Detection Thresholds in the Ferret
Hollensteiner, K. J., Pieper, F., Engler, G., Peter König, B., & Engel, A. K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124952 · Cited by 20
Extension of the observability rank condition to nonlinear systems driven by unknown inputs
Martinelli, A. (2015) · Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) · doi:10.1109/med.2015.7158811 · Cited by 17
“This problem has been investigated by many disciplines, both in the framework of computer science [7], [22], [23], [29], [34] and in the framework of neuroscience (e.g., [5], [10], [11]).”
BackgroundChen, A., Zeng, F., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2275-20.2021 · Cited by 19
“These heading thresholds are comparable to those found for both macaques and humans in previous studies (Gu et al., 2007, 2008; Fetsch et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013).”
ResultNghia, N. T., Takakura, H., Nishijo, H., Ueda, N., Ito, S., Fujisaka, M., Akaogi, K., & Shojaku, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00125 · Cited by 17
Arshad, Q., Cousins, S., Golding, J. F., & Bronstein, A. M. (2023) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2023.120579 · Cited by 18
“[51] Fetsch CR, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE.”
BackgroundStay, T. L., Laurens, J., Sillitoe, R. V., & Angelaki, D. E. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818819116 · Cited by 15
“For vertebrates, several senses are available to detect self-motion, notably vestibular and visual systems (1).”
BackgroundPerrone, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/18.4.1 · Cited by 15
Pareidolias and Creativity in Patients with Mental Disorders
Mavrogiorgou, P., Peitzmeier, N., Enzi, B., Flasbeck, V., & Juckel, G. (2021) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000512129 · Cited by 15
Exploration mode affects visuohaptic integration of surface orientation
Plaisier, M. A., van Dam, L. C. J., Glowania, C., & Ernst, M. O. (2014) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/14.13.22 · Cited by 13
Neural Encoding of Auditory Statistics
Skerritt-Davis, B., & Elhilali, M. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1887-20.2021 · Cited by 12
“…this correspondence, which is in line with previously reported feature fusion mechanisms observed within and between visual, somato-sensory, vestibular, and auditory sensory modalities (Treisman and Gelade, 1980; Angelaki et al., 2009; Fetsch et al., 2010; Parise et al., 2012; Ernst et al., 2013).”
ResultVisuo-vestibular heading perception: a model system to study multi-sensory decision making
Zeng, Z., Zhang, C., & Gu, Y. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0334 · Cited by 13
“This also stands in a visuo-vestibular heading discrimination task [20,64], which is embodied by steeper psychometric curve in the combined condition compared with that in either single-cue condition, as predicted by equation (3.4).”
ResultInfluentialA Symmetric Approach Elucidates Multisensory Information Integration
Tozzi, A., & Peters, J. F. (2016) · Information · doi:10.3390/info8010004 · Cited by 12
“When cues are available, combining them facilitates the detection of salient events and reduces perceptual uncertainty, in order to improve reactions to immediate dangers and to rapidly varying events [2].”
BackgroundMaking sense of multisensory integration
Molholm, S., & Foxe, J. J. (2010) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07238.x · Cited by 12
“In this issue Fetsch, DeAngelis and Angelaki describe how Bayesian decision theory accounts for the contributions of visual and vestibular information to estimations of one’s translation in space (Fetsch et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHow Optic Flow and Inertial Cues Improve Motion PerceptionPreprint
Angelaki, D. E. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024638 · Cited by 12
Object speed perception during lateral visual self-motion
Jörges, B., & Harris, L. R. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02372-4 · Cited by 11
Rapid reconfiguration of cortical networks after repeated exposure to visual-vestibular conflicts
Hua, A., Wang, G., Bai, J., Hao, Z., Yang, Y., Luo, X., Liu, J., Meng, J., & Wang, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73111-6 · Cited by 11
Gabriel, G. A., Harris, L. R., Henriques, D. Y. P., Pandi, M., & Campos, J. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.816512 · Cited by 12
“When visual and vestibular cues are congruent and redundant (as is typically the case during most everyday experiences), integrating these inputs improves the precision of perceptual estimates (Ernst and Bülthoff, 2004; Fetsch et al., 2010; Butler et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMiwa, T., Hisakata, R., & Kaneko, H. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.08.005 · Cited by 11
Effect of timing delay between visual and vestibular stimuli on heading perception
Rodriguez, R., & Crane, B. T. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00351.2020 · Cited by 10
Kemp, J. T., Cesanek, E., & Fulvio Domini, A. (2023) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.23.7.13 · Cited by 10
Being active over one’s own motion: Considering predictive mechanisms in self-motion perception
Rineau, A.-L., Bringoux, L., Sarrazin, J.-C., & Berberian, B. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105051 · Cited by 14
“Particularly, it has been largely explained by the theory of optimal integration (Fetsch et al, 2010, 2013; ter Horst et al., 2015).”
BackgroundNyamdavaa, E., Matsumoto, J., Chinzorig, C., Berthoz, A., Ono, T., & Nishijo, H. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00242 · Cited by 10
“These multiple sensory cues are integrated to reduce HD errors (Telford et al., 1995; Becker et al., 2002; Fetsch et al., 2010; Frissen et al., 2011).”
BackgroundVection strength increases with simulated eye-separation
Palmisano, S. A., Davies, R. G., & Brooks, K. R. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1609-5 · Cited by 10
Visual-inertial structure from motion: Observability vs minimum number of sensors
Martinelli, A. (2014) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6906979 · Cited by 9
“The visual-inertial structure from motion problem (from now on the Vi-SfM problem), has particular interest and has been investigated by many disciplines, both in the framework of computer science [3], [10], [11], [15], [17], [21] and in the framework of neuroscience (e.g., [2], [4], [5]).”
BackgroundEffect of range of heading differences on human visual–inertial heading estimation
Rodriguez, R., & Crane, B. T. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05506-1 · Cited by 8
“In such situations, the visual and inertial stimuli are integrated near optimally based on their relative reliabilities or Bayesian ideal (Knill and Pouget 2004; Fetsch et al. 2010; Crane 2017).”
Multisensory gaze stabilization in response to subchronic alteration of vestibular type I hair cells
Schenberg, L., Palou, A., Simon, F., Bonnard, T., Barton, C.-E., Fricker, D., Tagliabue, M., Llorens, J., & Beraneck, M. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.88819 · Cited by 11
“This filtering-out of a degraded signal has been shown during visuo-vestibular integration for monkey heading perception ( Fetsch et al., 2010 ), or for human object discrimination using visual and haptic senses ( Ernst and Banks, 2002 ).”
BackgroundIntegrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception
Schoenmaekers, C., Wuyts, F. L., & Ferrè, E. R. (2025) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-024-06992-8 · Cited by 9
“Verticality perception is crucial for postural stability, spatial awareness, and precise motor coordination (Lacquaniti et al. 2014; White et al. 2020; Glasauer and Mittelstaedt 1998; Fetsch et al. 2010; Kheradmand and Winnick 2017).”
Higher-order cognitive processes moderate body tilt effects in vection
Guterman, P. S., & Allison, R. S. (2019) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2019.03.004 · Cited by 9
Noise and vestibular perception of passive self-motion
Lacquaniti, F., Scaleia, B. L., & Zago, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1159242 · Cited by 8
Koh, K., Kwon, H. J., Park, Y. S., Kiemel, T., Miller, R. H., Kim, Y. H., Shin, J., & Shim, J. K. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00260 · Cited by 8
“We found that intra-auditory integration enhanced both online and offline motor synergy.”
BackgroundAccumulation of Inertial Sensory Information in the Perception of Whole Body Yaw Rotation
Nesti, A., de Winkel, K. N., & Bülthoff, H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170497 · Cited by 9
Common causation and offset effects in human visual-inertial heading direction integration
Rodriguez, R., & Crane, B. T. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00019.2020 · Cited by 6
Miller, M. A., O’Leary, C. J., Allen, P. D., & Crane, B. T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135335 · Cited by 7
“Since IN involves a physical motion and CE does not, one could raise the point that PSE measurements are actually measuring visual-vestibular integration, and not vection which is purely visual [42,43].”
BackgroundMeasurement and Modeling of the Effect of Sensory Conflicts on Driver Steering Control
Nash, C., & Cole, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · doi:10.1115/1.4042876 · Cited by 7
Rodriguez, R., & Crane, B. T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199097 · Cited by 7
Lebrun, F., Haliyo, S. D., Auvray, M., Gueorguiev, D., & Bailly, G. (2024) · Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM) · doi:10.1145/3649792.3649803 · Cited by 6
Kirollos, R., & Herdman, C. M. (2023) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/20416695231168093 · Cited by 7
“The third hypothesis states that perceived motion is based on an optimal weighted average of visual and vestibular sensory inputs (Fetsch et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBillock, V. A., Kinney, M. J., Schnupp, J. W. H., & Meredith, M. A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102527 · Cited by 5
Sharif, M., Saman, Y., Burling, R., Rea, O., Patel, R. P., Barrett, D., Rea, P. A., Kheradmand, A., & Arshad, Q. (2023) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2023.120617 · Cited by 5
Kern, A., Elwood, M., Vakula, M. N., Kim, Y., Bressel, E., & Dakin, C. J. (2025) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-025-07141-5 · Cited by 4
“According to sensory reweighting (Asslander and Peterka 2014 ; Peterka 2002 ) theory, and an optimal cue integration framework, the nervous system down-weights unreliable sensory channels and up-weights the most pre - cise channels (Ernst and Banks 2002 ; Fetsch et al. 2010 ).”
Wu, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Tian, H., Xu, J., Luo, W., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15111866 · Cited by 4
Visuoinertial and visual feedback in online steering control
Liu, J.-Y., Cooke, J. R. H., Selen, L. P. J., & Medendorp, W. P. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012659 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fetsch, C. R., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1721-1729
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- PMC
- PMC3108057
- OpenAlex
- W1961585049
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (5-T32-EY13360-07, R01EY019087, EY-019087, EY-016178, T32EY013360, R01EY016178)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC007620, R01DC007620)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- heading perception, visual-vestibular integration, multisensory integration, self-motion perception, Bayesian decision theory, ideal observer, single-unit recording, non-human primates, perceptual illusions, spatial orientation
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Humans, Motion Perception, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Visual Perception, Head Movements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review