Cited by 76Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Brain mechanisms involved in predatory aggression are activated in a laboratory model of violent intra‐specific aggression

Tulogdi, Aron, Toth, Mate, Halasz, Jozsef, Mikics, Eva, Fuzesi, Tamas, Haller, Jozsef·2010·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Callous-unemotional violence associated with antisocial personality disorder is often called 'predatory' because it involves restricted intention signaling and low emotional/physiological arousal, including decreased glucocorticoid production. This epithet may be a mere metaphor, but may also cover a structural similarity at the level of the hypothalamus where the control of affective and predatory aggression diverges. We investigated this hypothesis in a laboratory model where glucocorticoid production is chronically limited by adrenalectomy with glucocorticoid replacement (ADXr). This procedure was proposed to model important aspects of antisocial violence. Sham and ADXr rats were submitted to resident/intruder conflicts, and the resulting neuronal activation patterns were investigated by c-Fos immunocytochemistry. In line with earlier findings, the share of attacks aimed at vulnerable targets (head, throat and belly) was dramatically increased by ADXr, while intention signaling by offensive threats was restricted. Aggressive encounters activated the mediobasal hypothalamus, a region involved in intra-specific aggression, but sham and ADXr rats did not differ in this respect. In contrast, the activation of the lateral hypothalamus that is tightly involved in predatory aggression was markedly larger in ADXr rats; moreover, c-Fos counts correlated positively with the share of vulnerable attacks and negatively with social signaling. Glucocorticoid deficiency increased c-Fos ac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07429.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tulogdi, A., Toth, M., Halasz, J., Mikics, E., Fuzesi, T., & Haller, J.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-12
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
1744-1753
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1893342905
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
predatory aggression, callous-unemotional traits, antisocial personality disorder, glucocorticoid deficiency, lateral hypothalamus, mediobasal hypothalamus, central amygdala, periaqueductal gray, c-Fos activation, social signaling
MeSH terms
Adrenalectomy, Aggression, Amygdala, Animals, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Behavior, Animal, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Hypothalamus, Male, Neurons, Predatory Behavior, Social Behavior, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review