Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,054

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time

Hairston, Nelson G., Ellner, Stephen P., Geber, Monica A., Yoshida, Takehito, Fox, Jennifer A.·2005·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Recent studies have documented rates of evolution of ecologically important phenotypes sufficiently fast that they have the potential to impact the outcome of ecological interactions while they are underway. Observations of this type go against accepted wisdom that ecological and evolutionary dynamics occur at very different time scales. While some authors have evaluated the rapidity of a measured evolutionary rate by comparing it to the overall distribution of measured evolutionary rates, we believe that ecologists are mainly interested in rapid evolution because of its potential to impinge on ecological processes. We therefore propose that rapid evolution be defined as a genetic change occurring rapidly enough to have a measurable impact on simultaneous ecological change. Using this definition we propose a framework for decomposing rates of ecological change into components driven by simultaneous evolutionary change and by change in a non‐evolutionary factor (e.g. density dependent population dynamics, abiotic environmental change). Evolution is judged to be rapid in this ecological context if its contribution to ecological change is large relative to the contribution of other factors. We provide a worked example of this approach based on a theoretical predator–prey interaction [ Abrams, P. & Matsuda, H. (1997) . Evolution , 51, 1740], and find that in this system the impact of prey evolution on predator per capita growth rate is 63% that of internal ecological dynamics. We then propose analytical methods for measuring these contributions in field situations, and apply them to two long‐term data sets for which suitable ecological and evolutionary data exist. For both data sets relatively high rates of evolutionary change have been found when measured as character change in standard deviations per generation (haldanes). For Darwin's finches evolving in response to fluctuating rainfall [ Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. (2002) . Science , 296, 707], we estimate that evolutionary change has been more rapid than ecological change by a factor of 2.2. For a population of freshwater copepods whose life history evolves in response to fluctuating fish predation [ Hairston, N.G. Jr & Dillon, T.A. (1990) . Evolution , 44, 1796], we find that evolutionary change has been about one quarter the rate of ecological change – less than in the finch example, but nevertheless substantial. These analyses support the view that in order to understand temporal dynamics in ecological processes it is critical to consider the extent to which the attributes of the system under investigation are simultaneously changing as a result of rapid evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00812.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Abrams P., 1997, Prey evolution as a cause of predator–prey cycles, Evolution, 51, 1740
  2. 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0500:HREAAT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.214.4516.82 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.293.5530.657 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.292.5517.673 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1890/03-0788 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dobzhansky T., 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species
  8. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05337.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.x · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.x
  10. Ford E.B., 1964, Ecological Genetics
  11. Geber M.A., 1993, Biotic Interactions and Global Change
  12. 10.1126/science.222.4620.159 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2475/ajs.293.A.453 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gingerich P.D., 2001, Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process, Genetica, 112, 127, 10.1023/A:1013311015886 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2145 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.6505682 · DOI
  17. Grant P.R., 1986, Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches
  18. 10.1086/284924 · DOI
  19. 10.1098/rspb.1993.0016 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02236.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.1070315 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2442:EOENOE]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2442:eoenoe]2.0.co;2
  23. Hairston N.G., 1987, Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities
  24. 10.4319/lo.1988.33.6.1245 · doi:10.4319/lo.1988.33.6.1245
  25. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05250.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05250.x
  26. 10.2307/1542200 · doi:10.2307/1542200
  27. 10.1086/284236 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4831 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/46731 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00736.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04550.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1073/pnas.161281098 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.144.3618.548 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/hdy.1958.4 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kinnison M., 1998, Population‐specific variation in body dimensions of adult Chinook salmon (Oncorynchus tshawytscha) from New Zealand and their source population, 90 years after introduction, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 554, 10.1139/f97-303 · DOI
  36. Kümmerlin R.E., 1998, Taxonomic response of the phytoplankton community of Upper Lake Constance (Bodensee‐Obersee) to eutrophication and reoligotrophication, Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Advanc. Limnol., 53, 109
  37. 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1688:EHAATF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1086/285128 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Palumbi S.R., 2001, The Evolution Explosion: How Humans Cause Rapid Evolutionary Change
  40. R Development Core Team, 2004, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  41. 10.1126/science.275.5308.1934 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/366681a0 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Slobodkin L.B., 1961, Growth and Regulation of Animal Populations
  44. Sterner R.W., 2002, Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
  45. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04483.x · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nature01767 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2818 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,054

Metadata

Authors
Hairston, N. G., Ellner, S. P., Geber, M. A., Yoshida, T., & Fox, J. A.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-15
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1114-1127
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W1541870771
Cited by
1,054
References
1
FWCI
14.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00812.x
The paper
Hairston, N. G., Ellner, S. P., Geber, M. A., Yoshida, T., & Fox, J. A. (2005). Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00812.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.