The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities?
Open accessAbstract
Biological invasions dramatically affect the distribution, abundance and reproduction of many native species. Because of these ecological effects, exotic species can also influence the evolution of natives exposed to novel interactions with invaders. Evolutionary changes in natives in response to selection from exotics are usually overlooked, yet common responses include altered anti‐predator defenses, changes in the spectrum of resources and habitats used, and other adaptations that allow native populations to persist in invaded areas. Whether a native population is capable of responding evolutionarily to selection from invaders will depend on the demographic impact of the invader, the genetic architecture and genetic variability of the native population and potentially the history of previous invasions. In some cases, natives will fail to evolve or otherwise adapt, and local or global extinction will result. In other cases, adaptive change in natives may diminish impacts of invaders and potentially promote coexistence between invaders and natives. Here, we review the evidence for evolutionary responses of native species to novel community members. We also discuss how the effects of introduced species may differ from those caused by natural range expansions of native species. Notably, introduced species may come from remote biotas with no previous evolutionary history with the native community. In addition, the rate of addition of introduced species into communities is much greater than all but the most extreme cases of historical biotic exchange. Understanding the evolutionary component of exotic/native species interactions is critical to recognizing the long‐term impacts of biological invasions, and to understanding the role of evolutionary processes in the assembly and dynamics of natural communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems
Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01286 · Cited by 11,265
THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam
Fritts, T. H., & Rodda, G. H. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.113 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Are Modern Biological Invasions an Unprecedented Form of Global Change?
RICCIARDI, A. (2007) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00615.x · Cited by 520
Schweiger, O., Biesmeijer, J. C., Bommarco, R., Hickler, T., Hulme, P. E., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Moora, M., Nielsen, A., Ohlemüller, R., et al. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00125.x · Cited by 431
Agosta, S. J., & Klemens, J. A. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01237.x · Cited by 317
Agosta, S. J., Janz, N., & Brooks, D. R. (2010) · Zoologia (Curitiba) · doi:10.1590/s1984-46702010000200001 · Cited by 316
BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss, S. Y., Lau, J. A., & Carroll, S. P.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-374
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2137315112
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00874.x
- The paper
- Strauss, S. Y., Lau, J. A., & Carroll, S. P. (2006). Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00874.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.