Cited by 431Plant and animal studiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination

Open access
Schweiger, Oliver, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C., Bommarco, Riccardo, Hickler, Thomas, Hulme, Philip E., Klotz, Stefan, Kühn, Ingolf, Moora, Mari +14 more·2010·Biological Reviews

Abstract

Global change may substantially affect biodiversity and ecosystem functioning but little is known about its effects on essential biotic interactions. Since different environmental drivers rarely act in isolation it is important to consider interactive effects. Here, we focus on how two key drivers of anthropogenic environmental change, climate change and the introduction of alien species, affect plant-pollinator interactions. Based on a literature survey we identify climatically sensitive aspects of species interactions, assess potential effects of climate change on these mechanisms, and derive hypotheses that may form the basis of future research. We find that both climate change and alien species will ultimately lead to the creation of novel communities. In these communities certain interactions may no longer occur while there will also be potential for the emergence of new relationships. Alien species can both partly compensate for the often negative effects of climate change but also amplify them in some cases. Since potential positive effects are often restricted to generalist interactions among species, climate change and alien species in combination can result in significant threats to more specialist interactions involving native species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00125.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of invasions driving biodiversity change must be considered in concert with other drivers, such as climate or land-use change.

    “The impact of invasions driving biodiversity change must be considered not only on its own (as are drivers listed by Ripple et al., 2017) but in concert with other drivers, such as climate or land‐use change (Bradford et al., 2007; Walther et al., 2009; Schweiger et al., 2010; Hulme, 2011b; Chytrý et al., 2012).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Schweiger et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schweiger, O., Biesmeijer, J. C., Bommarco, R., Hickler, T., Hulme, P. E., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Moora, M., Nielsen, A., Ohlemüller, R., Petanidou, T., Potts, S. G., Pyšek, P., Stout, J. C., Sykes, M. T., Tscheulin, T., Vilà, M., Walther, G., Westphal, C., Winter, M., Zobel, M., & Settele, J.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • University of the Aegean (GR)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Schweiger, Oliver
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
777-795
ISSN
  • 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
OpenAlex
W2007982132
Cited by
431
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
multiple stressors, climate change, introduced species, plant-pollinator interactions, pollination, species interactions, interaction effects, native species, global change
MeSH terms
Animals, Insecta, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Pollination, Climate Change, Introduced Species, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review