The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
Abstract
Plant functional traits control a variety of terrestrial ecosystem processes, including soil carbon storage which is a key component of the global carbon cycle. Plant traits regulate net soil carbon storage by controlling carbon assimilation, its transfer and storage in belowground biomass, and its release from soil through respiration, fire and leaching. However, our mechanistic understanding of these processes is incomplete. Here, we present a mechanistic framework, based on the plant traits that drive soil carbon inputs and outputs, for understanding how alteration of vegetation composition will affect soil carbon sequestration under global changes. First, we show direct and indirect plant trait effects on soil carbon input and output through autotrophs and heterotrophs, and through modification of abiotic conditions, which need to be considered to determine the local carbon sequestration potential. Second, we explore how the composition of key plant traits and soil biota related to carbon input, release and storage prevail in different biomes across the globe, and address the biome‐specific mechanisms by which plant trait composition may impact on soil carbon sequestration. We propose that a trait‐based approach will help to develop strategies to preserve and promote carbon sequestration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the chief initial method of carbon transfer to soil is via recent photosynthesis and subsequent transfer to plant roots (Jime ´nez and Lal, 2006;De Deyn et al., 2008;Taylor et al., 2009;Orwin et al., 2010) and thence to soil organic matter (Ko ¨gel-Knabner, 2002).”
From Breeding crop plants with deep roots: their role in sustainable carbon, nutrient and water sequestration (2011) · cites this paper as De Deyn et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationEFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Let the concept of trait be functional!
Violle, C., Navas, M., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I., & Garnier, É. (2007) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x · Cited by 5,732
THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION
Jobbagy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:tvdoso]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,607
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Self-citationMycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf‐Engel, R., Böller, T., Wiemken, A., & Sanders, I. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23932 · Cited by 3,587
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Crämer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., et al. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x · Cited by 3,343
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns
Aerts, R., & Chapin, F. S. (1999) · Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60016-1 · Cited by 2,897
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome
Lundberg, D. S., Lebeis, S. L., Paredes, S. H., Yourstone, S., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., Rio, T. G. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11237 · Cited by 2,879
Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320054111 · Cited by 2,550
The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora
Kleyer, M., Bekker, R. M., Knevel, I. C., Bakker, J. P., Thompson, K. A., Sonnenschein, M., Poschlod, P., Groenendael, J. M. V., Klimeš, L., Klimešová, J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x · Cited by 1,614
Self-citationImproving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology
Brooker, R. W., Bennett, A. E., Cong, W., Daniell, T. J., George, T., Hallett, P. D., Hawes, C., Iannetta, P. P. M., Jones, H. G., Karley, A. J., et al. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13132 · Cited by 1,498
Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes
Bardgett, R. D., Mommer, L., & de Vries, F. T. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006 · Cited by 1,366
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 516-531
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2109895772
- Cited by
- 1,431
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 66.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D003946/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- plant functional traits, soil carbon sequestration, soil carbon storage, belowground biomass, soil respiration, heterotrophs, autotrophs, soil organisms, vegetation composition change, global change, trait-based approach
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Biological, Carbon, Plants, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
