Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 654

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marine reserves: size and age do matter

Claudet, Joachim, Osenberg, Craig W., Benedetti‐Cecchi, Lisandro, Domenici, Paolo, García‐Charton, José‐Antonio, Pérez‐Ruzafa, Ángel, Badalamenti, Fabio, Bayle‐Sempere, Just, Brito, Alberto, Bulleri, Fabio, Culioli, Jean‐Michel, Dimech, Mark, Falcón, Jesús M., Guala, Ivan, Milazzo, Marco, Sánchez‐Meca, Julio, Somerfield, Paul J., Stobart, Ben, Vandeperre, Frédéric, Valle, Carlos, Planes, Serge·2008·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Marine reserves are widely used throughout the world to prevent overfishing and conserve biodiversity, but uncertainties remain about their optimal design. The effects of marine reserves are heterogeneous. Despite theoretical findings, empirical studies have previously found no effect of size on the effectiveness of marine reserves in protecting commercial fish stocks. Using 58 datasets from 19 European marine reserves, we show that reserve size and age do matter: Increasing the size of the no‐take zone increases the density of commercial fishes within the reserve compared with outside; whereas the size of the buffer zone has the opposite effect. Moreover, positive effects of marine reserve on commercial fish species and species richness are linked to the time elapsed since the establishment of the protection scheme. The reserve size‐dependency of the response to protection has strong implications for the spatial management of coastal areas because marine reserves are used for spatial zoning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01166.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 654

Metadata

Authors
Claudet, J., Osenberg, C. W., Benedetti‐Cecchi, L., Domenici, P., García‐Charton, J., Pérez‐Ruzafa, Á., Badalamenti, F., Bayle‐Sempere, J., Brito, A., Bulleri, F., Culioli, J., Dimech, M., Falcón, J. M., Guala, I., Milazzo, M., Sánchez‐Meca, J., Somerfield, P. J., Stobart, B., Vandeperre, F., Valle, C., & Planes, S.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-24
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
481-489
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2169828319
Cited by
654
References
5
FWCI
32.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marine reserves: size and age do matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01166.x
The paper
Claudet, J., Osenberg, C. W., Benedetti‐Cecchi, L., Domenici, P., García‐Charton, J., Pérez‐Ruzafa, Á., Badalamenti, F., Bayle‐Sempere, J., Brito, A., Bulleri, F., Culioli, J., Dimech, M., Falcón, J. M., Guala, I., Milazzo, M., Sánchez‐Meca, J., Somerfield, P. J., Stobart, B., Vandeperre, F., . . . Planes, S. (2008). Marine reserves: size and age do matter. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01166.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.