The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester
Abstract
Summary: A culture‐independent molecular phylogenetic approach was used to study prokaryotic diversity in an anaerobic sludge digester. Two 16S rRNA gene libraries were constructed using total genomic DNA, and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific for archaeal or bacterial domains. Phylogenetic analysis of 246 and 579 almost full‐length 16S rRNA genes for Archaea and Bacteria , respectively, was performed using the ARB software package. Phylogenetic groups affiliated with the Archaea belong to Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota . Interestingly, we detected a novel monophyletic group of 164 clones representing 66.6% of the archaeal library. Culture enrichment and probe hybridization show that this group grows better under formate or H 2 –CO 2 . Within the bacterial library 95.6% of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) represent novel putative phylotypes never described before, and affiliated with eight divisions. The Bacteroidetes phylum is the most abundant and diversified phylogenetic group representing 38.8% of the OTUs, followed by the Gram‐positives (27.7%) and the Proteobacteria (21.3%). Sequences affiliated with phylogenetic divisions represented by few cultivated representatives such as the Chloroflexi , Synergistes , Thermotogales or candidate divisions such as OP9 and OP8 are represented by <5% of the total OTUs. A comprehensive set of 15 16S and 23S rRNA‐targeted oligonucleotide hybridization probes was used to quantify these major groups by dot blot hybridization within 12 digester samples. In contrast to the clone library, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria together accounted for 21.8 ± 14.9% representing the most abundant phyla. They were surprisingly followed by the Chloroflexi representing 20.2 ± 4.6% of the total 16S rRNA. The Proteobacteria and the Bacteroidetes group accounted for 14.4 ± 4.9% and 14.5 ± 4.3%, respectively, WWE1, a novel lineage, accounted for 11.9 ± 3.1% while Planctomycetes and Synergistes represented <2% each. Using the novel set of probes we extended the coverage of bacterial populations from 52% to 85.3% of the total rRNA within the digester samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ARIESYADY, H., ITO, T., & OKABE, S. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.036 · Cited by 549
A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters
Nelson, M. C., Morrison, M., & Yu, Z. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.119 · Cited by 489
Steinberg, L. M., & Regan, J. M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00553-08 · Cited by 435
Mühling, M., Woolven-Allen, J., Murrell, J. C., & Joint, I. (2008) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.97 · Cited by 304
Wastewater treatment: a model system for microbial ecology
Daims, H., Taylor, M. W., & Wagner, M. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.002 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Chouari, R., Le Paslier, D., Daegelen, P., Ginestet, P., Weissenbach, J., & Sghir, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1104-1115
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2118313865
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00795.x
- The paper
- Chouari, R., Le Paslier, D., Daegelen, P., Ginestet, P., Weissenbach, J., & Sghir, A. (2005). Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00795.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.