The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Despite its long‐term use in bioremediation, bioaugmentation of contaminated sites with microbial cells continues to be a source of controversy within environmental microbiology. This largely results from its notoriously unreliable performance record. In this article, we argue that the unpredictable nature of the approach comes from the initial strain selection step. Up until now, this has been dictated by the search for catabolically competent microorganisms, with little or no consideration given to other essential features that are required to be functionally active and persistent in target habitats. We describe how technical advances in molecular biology and analytical chemistry, now enable assessments of the functional diversity and spatial distribution of microbial communities to be made in situ . These advances now enable microbial populations, targeted for exploitation, to be differentiated to the cell level, an advance that is bound to improve microbial selection and exploitation. We argue that this information‐based approach is already proving to be more effective than the traditional ‘black‐box’ approach of strain selection. The future perspectives and opportunities for improving selection of effective microbial strains for bioaugmentation are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boschker, H. T. S., Nold, S. C., Wellsbury, P., Bos, D., de Graaf, W., Pel, R., Parkes, R. J., & Cappenberg, T. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33900 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Review: In situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments
Perelo, L. W. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.090 · Cited by 592
Bioaugmentation as a strategy for the remediation of pesticide-polluted soil: A review
Cycoń, M., Mrozik, A., & Piotrowska-Seget, Z. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.129 · Cited by 501
Zhang, H., Yuan, X., Xiong, T., Wang, H., & Jiang, L. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125657 · Cited by 485
Bioaugmentation and its application in wastewater treatment: A review
Herrero, M., & Stuckey, D. C. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.033 · Cited by 461
Environmental biocatalysis: from remediation with enzymes to novel green processes
Alcalde, M., Ferrer, M., Plou, F. J., & Ballesteros, A. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.04.002 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, I. P., Van Der Gast, C. J., Ciric, L., & Singer, A. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 909-915
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2093473097
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00804.x
- The paper
- Thompson, I. P., Van Der Gast, C. J., Ciric, L., & Singer, A. C. (2005). Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00804.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.