The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and phylotype consistency of bacteria in the guts of three bee species ( Apoidea ) at an oilseed rape field
Abstract
Summary: The gut of insects may harbour one of the largest reservoirs of a yet unexplored microbial diversity. To understand how specific insects select for their own bacterial communities, the structural diversity and variability of bacteria found in the gut of different bee species was analysed. For three successive years, adults and larvae of Apis mellifera ssp. carnica (honey bee), and Bombus terrestris (bumble bee), as well as larvae of Osmia bicornis (red mason bee) were collected at a flowering oilseed rape field. Total DNA was extracted from gut material and the bacterial diversity was analysed, independent of cultivation, by genetic profiling with single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐amplified partial 16S rRNA genes. The SSCP profiles were specific for all bee species and for larvae and adults. Qualitative and quantitative differences were found in the bacterial community structure of larvae and adults of A. mellifera , but differences in B. terrestris were mainly quantitative. Sequencing of the PCR products revealed a dominance of Alpha ‐, Beta ‐, and Gammaproteobacteria , Bacteroidetes , and Firmicutes in all bee species. Single‐strand conformation polymorphism profiles suggested a higher abundance and diversity of lactobacilli in adults of A. mellifera than in larvae. Further phylogenetic analyses indicated common bacterial phylotypes for all three bee species, e.g. those related to Simonsiella , Serratia , and Lactobacillus . Clades related to Delftia acidovorans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Lactobacillus intestinalis only contained sequences from larvae. Several of the bee‐specific clusters also contained identical or highly similar sequences from bacteria detected in other A. mellifera subspecies from South Africa, suggesting the existence of cosmopolitan gut bacteria in bees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review
Kuzyakov, Y., & Blagodatskaya, E. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025 · Cited by 1,872
Establishment of Characteristic Gut Bacteria during Development of the Honeybee Worker
Martinson, V. G., Moy, J., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.07810-11 · Cited by 587
Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?
Colman, D. R., Toolson, E. C., & Takacs‐Vesbach, C. D. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05752.x · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohr, K. I., & Tebbe, C. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-272
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1968129467
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and phylotype consistency of bacteria in the guts of three bee species ( Apoidea ) at an oilseed rape field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00893.x
- The paper
- Mohr, K. I., & Tebbe, C. C. (2006). Diversity and phylotype consistency of bacteria in the guts of three bee species ( Apoidea ) at an oilseed rape field. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00893.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.