The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximum growth rates and possible life strategies of different bacterioplankton groups in relation to phosphorus availability in a freshwater reservoir
Abstract
Summary: We investigated net growth rates of distinct bacterioplankton groups and heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) communities in relation to phosphorus availability by analysing eight in situ manipulation experiments, conducted between 1997 and 2003, in the canyon‐shaped Římov reservoir (Czech Republic). Water samples were size‐fractionated and incubated in dialysis bags at the sampling site or transplanted into an area of the reservoir, which differed in phosphorus limitation (range of soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations – SRP, 0.7–96 µg l −1 ). Using five different rRNA‐targeted oligonucleotide probes, net growth rates of the probe‐defined bacterial groups and HNF assemblages were estimated and related to SRP using Monod kinetics, yielding growth rate constants specific for each bacterial group. We found highly significant differences among their maximum growth rates while insignificant differences were detected in the saturation constants. However, the latter constants represent only tentative estimates mainly due to insufficient sensitivity of the method used at low in situ SRP concentrations. Interestingly, in these same experiments HNF assemblages grew significantly faster than any bacterial group studied except for a small, but abundant cluster of Betaproteobacteria (targeted by the R‐BT065 probe). Potential ecological implications of different growth capabilities for possible life strategies of different bacterial phylogenetic lineages are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High temporal and inter‐individual variation detected in the human ileal microbiota
Booijink, C. C. G. M., El‐Aidy, S., Rajilić‐Stojanović, M., Heilig, H. G. H. J., Troost, F. J., Smidt, H., Kleerebezem, M., De Vos, W. M., & Zoetendal, E. G. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02294.x · Cited by 324
Selective colonization of insoluble substrates by human faecal bacteria
Leitch, E. C. M., Walker, A. W., Duncan, S. H., Holtrop, G., & Flint, H. J. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01186.x · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Šimek, K., Horňák, K., Jezbera, J., Nedoma, J., Vrba, J., Straškrábová, V., Macek, M., Dolan, J. R., & Hahn, M. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1613-1624
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2123069140
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum growth rates and possible life strategies of different bacterioplankton groups in relation to phosphorus availability in a freshwater reservoir. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01053.x
- The paper
- Šimek, K., Horňák, K., Jezbera, J., Nedoma, J., Vrba, J., Straškrábová, V., Macek, M., Dolan, J. R., & Hahn, M. W. (2006). Maximum growth rates and possible life strategies of different bacterioplankton groups in relation to phosphorus availability in a freshwater reservoir. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01053.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.