Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microarray and genetic analysis of electron transfer to electrodes in Geobacter sulfurreducens

Holmes, Dawn E., Chaudhuri, Swades K., Nevin, Kelly P., Mehta, Teena, Methé, Barbara A., Liu, Anna, Ward, Joy E., Woodard, Trevor L., Webster, Jennifer, Lovley, Derek R.·2006·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Whole‐genome analysis of gene expression in Geobacter sulfurreducens revealed 474 genes with transcript levels that were significantly different during growth with an electrode as the sole electron acceptor versus growth on Fe(III) citrate. The greatest response was a more than 19‐fold increase in transcript levels for omcS , which encodes an outer‐membrane cytochrome previously shown to be required for Fe(III) oxide reduction. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Northern analyses confirmed the higher levels of omcS transcripts, which increased as power production increased. Deletion of omcS inhibited current production that was restored when omcS was expressed in trans. Transcript expression and genetic analysis suggested that OmcE, another outer‐membrane cytochrome, is also involved in electron transfer to electrodes. Surprisingly, genes for other proteins known to be important in Fe(III) reduction such as the outer‐membrane c ‐type cytochrome, OmcB, and the electrically conductive pilin ‘nanowires’ did not have higher transcript levels on electrodes, and deletion of the relevant genes did not inhibit power production. Changes in the transcriptome suggested that cells growing on electrodes were subjected to less oxidative stress than cells growing on Fe(III) citrate and that a number of genes annotated as encoding metal efflux proteins or proteins of unknown function may be important for growth on electrodes. These results demonstrate for the first time that it is possible to evaluate gene expression, and hence the metabolic state, of microorganisms growing on electrodes on a genome‐wide basis and suggest that OmcS, and to a lesser extent OmcE, are important in electron transfer to electrodes. This has important implications for the design of electrode materials and the genetic engineering of microorganisms to improve the function of microbial fuel cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01065.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Holmes, D. E., Chaudhuri, S. K., Nevin, K. P., Mehta, T., Methé, B. A., Liu, A., Ward, J. E., Woodard, T. L., Webster, J., & Lovley, D. R.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1805-1815
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2113402087
Cited by
332
References
6
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microarray and genetic analysis of electron transfer to electrodes in Geobacter sulfurreducens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01065.x
The paper
Holmes, D. E., Chaudhuri, S. K., Nevin, K. P., Mehta, T., Methé, B. A., Liu, A., Ward, J. E., Woodard, T. L., Webster, J., & Lovley, D. R. (2006). Microarray and genetic analysis of electron transfer to electrodes in Geobacter sulfurreducens. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01065.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.