The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographic distance and pH drive bacterial distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Continent‐scale biogeography has been extensively studied in soils and marine systems, but little is known about biogeographical patterns in non‐marine sediments. We used barcode pyrosequencing to quantify the effects of local geochemical properties and geographic distance for bacterial community structure and membership, using sediment samples from 15 lakes on the Tibetan Plateau (4–1670 km apart). Bacterial communities were surprisingly diverse, and distinct from soil communities. Four of 26 phyla detected were dominant: Proteobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes and Actinobacteria , albeit 20.2% of sequences were unclassified at the phylum level. As previously observed in acidic soil, pH was the dominant factor influencing alkaline sediment community structure, phylotype richness and phylogenetic diversity. In contrast, archaeal communities were less affected by pH. More geographically distant sites had more dissimilar communities ( r = 0.443, P = 0.030). Variance partitioning analysis showed that geographic distance (historical contingencies) contributed more to bacterial community variation (12.2%) than any other factor, although the environmental factors explained more variance when combined (28.9%). Together, our results show that pH is the best predictor of bacterial community structure in alkaline sediments, and confirm that both geographic distance and chemical factors govern bacterial biogeography in lake sediments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Self-citationSearch and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Self-citationThe diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
Faith, D. P. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · Cited by 5,693
TOWARD AN ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL BACTERIA
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., & Jackson, R. B. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-1839 · Cited by 5,079
Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil
Rousk, J., Bååth, E., Brookes, P. C., Lauber, C. L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.58 · Cited by 4,223
Self-citationLauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Self-citation
Cited by
Living at the Extremes: Extremophiles and the Limits of Life in a Planetary Context
Merino, N., Aronson, H. S., Bojanova, D. P., Feyhl-Buska, J., Wong, M. L., Zhang, S., & Giovannelli, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00780 · Cited by 658
Zhao, J., Ni, T., Li, J., Lu, Q., Fang, Z., Huang, Q., Zhang, R., Li, R., Shen, B., & Shen, Q. (2016) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.006 · Cited by 429
Oulas, A., Pavloudi, C., Polymenakou, P., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Papanikolaou, N., Kotoulas, G., Arvanitidis, C., & Iliopoulos, L. (2015) · Bioinformatics and Biology Insights · doi:10.4137/bbi.s12462 · Cited by 416
Distribution of sediment bacterial and archaeal communities in plateau freshwater lakes
Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Xie, S., & Liu, Y. (2015) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-6262-x · Cited by 270
Self-citationWang, Z.-M., Lu, Z.-M., Shi, J.-S., & Xu, Z.-H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26818 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, J., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Zeng, J., Hou, J., Yang, Y., Yao, T., Knight, R., & Chu, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2457-2466
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2119472607
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic distance and pH drive bacterial distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02799.x
- The paper
- Xiong, J., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Zeng, J., Hou, J., Yang, Y., Yao, T., Knight, R., & Chu, H. (2012). Geographic distance and pH drive bacterial distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02799.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
