Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks
Abstract
AIM: The increased utilization of smartphones within the clinical environment together with connected applications (apps) provides opportunity for doctors, including coloproctologists, to integrate such technology into clinical practice. However, the reliability of unregulated medical apps has recently been called into question. Here, we review contemporary medical apps specifically themed towards colorectal diseases and assess levels of medical professional involvement in their design and content. METHOD: The most popular smartphone app stores (iPhone, Android, Blackberry, Nokia, Windows and Samsung) were searched for colorectal disease themed apps, using the disease terms colorectal cancer, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, haemorrhoids, anal fissure, bowel incontinence and irritable bowel syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 68 individual colorectal themed apps were identified, amongst which there were five duplicates. Only 29% of colorectal apps had had customer satisfaction ratings and 32% had named medical professional involvement in their development or content. CONCLUSION: The benefits of apps are offset by lack of colorectal specification. There is little medical professional involvement in their design. Increased regulation is required to improve accountability of app content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Apps for detecting cancers tend to lack scientific and specialty input.
“It has also been suggested that apps for detecting cancers tend to lack scientific and specialty input, 8”
From Smartphone applications for melanoma detection by community, patient and generalist clinician users: a review (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
Reviews of smartphone apps for dermatology in general and for colorectal cancer have reported similar findings of scanty scientific evidence.
“Reviews of smartphone apps for dermatology in general, 7,11 and for colorectal cancer, 8 have reported similar findings.”
From Smartphone applications for melanoma detection by community, patient and generalist clinician users: a review (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Boulos, M. N. K., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., & Jones, R. B. (2011) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/1475-925x-10-24 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Glasgow, R. E., Funnell, M. M., Bonomi, A. E., Davis, C., Beckham, V., & Wagner, E. H. (2002) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2402_04 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Smartphone applications for pain management
Rosser, B. A., & Eccleston, C. (2011) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2011.101102 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Review of mobile communication devices as potential reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens
Brady, R. R. W., Verran, J., Damani, N., & Gibb, A. P. (2009) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.12.009 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Evaluation of the Use of Smartphones to Communicate Between Clinicians: A Mixed-Methods Study
Wu, R. C., Rossos, P. G., Quan, S. D., Reeves, S., Lo, V., Wong, B. M., Cheung, M., & Morra, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1655 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Smartphone Apps for Orthopaedic Surgeons
Franko, O. I. (2011) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Surfing The Web: Practicing Medicine in a Technological Age: Using Smartphones in Clinical Practice
Burdette, S. D., Herchline, T., & Oehler, R. L. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/588788 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
From Mobile Phones to Personal Wellness Dashboards
Kailas, A., Chong, C., & Watanabe, F. (2010) · IEEE Pulse · doi:10.1109/mpul.2010.937244 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Brady, R. R. W., HUNT, A. C., Visvanathan, A., et al. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03493.x · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationMedical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology: Correspondence
Hamilton, A. D., & Brady, R. R. W. (2012) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10844.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationTerry, M. (2010) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.9999 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The uses of the iPhone for surgeons
Dala-Ali, B. M., Lloyd, M. A., & Al-Abed, Y. A. (2010) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.014 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Infectious Diseases Resources for the iPhone
Oehler, R. L., Smith, K., & Toney, J. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/651602 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Increasing Clinical Presence of Mobile Communication Technology: Avoiding the Pitfalls
Visvanathan, A., Gibb, A. P., & Brady, R. R. W. (2011) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0018 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationTuijn, C. J., Hoefman, B. J., van Beijma, H., Oskam, L., & Chevrollier, N. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028348 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Gurland, B., Alves-Ferreira, P. C., Sobol, T., & Kiran, R. P. (2010) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181d87468 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Neurosurgical apps for iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad and Android
Kubben, P. (2010) · Surgical Neurology International · doi:10.4103/2152-7806.74148 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
General Practitioner Referral of Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Springall, R. G., & Todd, I. P. (1988) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107688808100211 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS FOR THE UROLOGY TRAINEE
Abboudi, H., & Amin, K. (2011) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.10640.x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Electronic Patient Data Confidentiality Practices Among Surgical Trainees: Questionnaire Study
Mole, D. J., Fox, C., & Napolitano, G. (2006) · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/003588406x117089 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The smart phone: An indispensable tool for the plastic surgeon?
Hunter, T. J. A., Hardwicke, J., & Rayatt, S. (2009) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.010 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Anaesthetists and apps: content and contamination concerns
Rodrigues, M. A., & Brady, R. R. W. (2011) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06972.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationAnesthesia Apps: Overview of Current Technology and Intelligent Search Techniques
Kraidin, J. L., Ginsberg, S. H., & Solina, A. R. (2012) · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.11.010 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
New Technologies to Advance Self-Management Support in Diabetes
Fisher, L., & Dickinson, W. P. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-1830 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS FOR THE UROLOGY TRAINEE
Makanjuola, J. K., & Bultitude, M. F. (2011) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10831.x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fighting colorectal cancer with information technology
Sewitch, M. J., & Barkun, A. N. (2011) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.111-2044 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification
Kamel Boulos, M. N., Brewer, A. C., Karimkhani, C., Buller, D. B., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2014) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Medication Adherence Apps: Review and Content Analysis
Ahmed, I., Ahmad, N. S., Ali, S., Ali, S., George, A., Saleem Danish, H., Uppal, E., Soo, J., Mobasheri, M. H., King, D., et al. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6432 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Pandey, A., Hasan, S., Dubey, D., & Sarangi, S. (2013) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Smartphone breast applications – What's the evidence?
Mobasheri, M. H., Johnston, M., King, D., Leff, D., Thiruchelvam, P., & Darzi, A. (2014) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.07.006 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Kassianos, A. P., Emery, J. D., Murchie, P., & Walter, F. M. (2015) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.13665 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Methods for Smartphone Health Apps
BinDhim, N. F., Hawkey, A., & Trevena, L. (2015) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0088 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Rincon, E., Monteiro-Guerra, F., Rivera-Romero, O., Dorronzoro-Zubiete, E., Sanchez-Bocanegra, C. L., & Gabarron, E. (2017) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.8741 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Usability factors of mobile health application for chronic diseases
Zahra, F., Hussain, A., & Mohd, H. (2016) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.4960948 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Jones, C., O'Toole, K., Jones, K., & Brémault-Phillips, S. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/19807 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Evaluating the quality of resilience apps for military members and public safety personnel
O’Toole, K., & Brown, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health · doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2020-0002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- O’Neill, S., & Brady, R. R. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brady, R. R. W.
- Venue
- Colorectal Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e530-4
- ISSN
- 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1318
- OpenAlex
- W1849127896
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Colorectal Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- mobile application, colorectal diseases, colorectal cancer, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, hemorrhoids, anal fissure, fecal incontinence, irritable bowel syndrome, app store search, clinical practice integration
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Intestinal Diseases, Patient Education as Topic, Software, Internet, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone, Diagnostic Self Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
