Cited by 78Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Adherence in patients transferred from immediate release metformin to a sustained release formulation: a population‐based study

Donnelly, L. A., Morris, A. D., Pearson, E. R.·2009·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aim: Metformin is the most commonly prescribed oral agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It is effective at reducing glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) and decreasing microvascular and macrovascular disease. However, up to 25% of patients develop gastrointestinal side effects leading to cessation in 5–10% of users. Metformin XL (glucophage SR) is a once a day preparation that delays absorption, leading to decreased peak metformin concentrations. We hypothesised that the XL preparation of metformin would be better tolerated than the standard immediate release (IR) preparation leading to improved adherence to therapy. Methods: In a retrospective observational study, we studied adherence and glycaemic control in patients prescribed metformin IR and XL preparations in Tayside, UK. Results: Metformin XL was used by 137 patients during the study period. Overall adherence was greater in the XL group (80%) compared with the 10 772 patients in the IR group (72%, p = 0.0026). In the 40 patients who changed from metformin IR to metformin XL who had sufficient data to determine adherence, the adherence increased from 62% in the IR group to 81% in the XL group (p < 0.0001). This was associated with an HbA1c reduction from 9.1 to 8.4% (p = 0.0739, n = 29). Conclusions: Metformin XL use is associated with increased adherence compared with the IR preparation, although the mechanism for this cannot be determined from this study. In patients intolerant of metformin IR the XL preparation should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00973.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, L. A., Morris, A. D., & Pearson, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, E. R.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
338-342
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2041179090
Cited by
78
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NHS Education for Scotland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
metformin, sustained-release formulation, medication adherence, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, gastrointestinal adverse effects, drug intolerance, formulation switching
MeSH terms
Aged, Delayed-Action Preparations, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Metformin, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review