Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs
Open accessAbstract
Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields used to treat cancerous tumors. This novel treatment modality effectively inhibits the growth of solid tumors in vivo and has shown promise in pilot clinical trials in patients with advanced stage solid tumors. TTFields were tested for their potential to inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs in two animal models: (1) Mice injected with malignant melanoma cells (B16F10) into the tail vein, (2) New Zealand White rabbits implanted with VX-2 tumors within the kidney capsule. Mice and rabbits were treated using two-directional TTFields at 100-200 kHz. Animals were either monitored for survival, or sacrificed for pathological and histological analysis of the lungs. The total number of lung surface metastases and the absolute weight of the lungs were both significantly lower in TTFields treated mice then in sham control mice. TTFields treated rabbits survived longer than sham control animals. This extension in survival was found to be due to an inhibition of metastatic spread, seeding or growth in the lungs of TTFields treated rabbits compared to controls. Histologically, extensive peri- and intra-tumoral immune cell infiltration was seen in TTFields treated rabbits only. These results raise the possibility that in addition to their proven inhibitory effect on the growth of solid tumors, TTFields may also have clinical benefit in the prevention of metastatic spread from primary tumors.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In two animal models, TTFields reduced lung metastases and prolonged survival in rabbits with VX-2 kidney tumors. The effects may involve direct inhibition of metastatic cells and/or a systemic anti-tumor immune response.
Key findings
- In mice, 7 days of TTFields reduced surface lung metastases versus sham controls (1.5 ± 1 vs. 10.3 ± 8.4; P < 0.01) and lowered lung weight (212 ± 10 vs. 253 ± 20 mg; P < 0.01). After 1 week of recovery, total metastases were similar (18 ± 12 vs. 17 ± 15; P = 0.87), but size distribution differed significantly (P < 0.05), with more large metastases in controls and more small metastases in treated mice.
- In rabbits, TTFields reduced primary kidney tumor volume after treatment (29.0 ± 18.5 vs. 61.1 ± 38.5 cm³; P = 0.0011) and daily growth rate (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 3.2; P = 0.003). Median survival was 70 days in treated rabbits versus 57 days in controls (Log-Rank P < 0.05).
- Rabbit lung metastases were lower when treatment began before day 14 from implantation (n = 12; Fig. 6c; the text reports this as significant while listing P > 0.05), with a trend toward fewer large metastases >3 mm (P = 0.11); no difference was seen when treatment started later. Histology showed fewer metastases per cross-section (11.8 vs. 23.2), smaller mean diameter (1.4 mm vs. 6.2 mm), greater mononuclear infiltration (score 2.0 vs. 1.4), and increased CD4, CD8, and CD45 T-cell counts in TTFields-treated rabbits.
Methods
- Two animal models were used: female C57BL/6 mice (n = 35) injected IV with B16F10 melanoma and treated with two-directional 100 kHz TTFields for 7 days; and New Zealand White rabbits implanted with VX-2 tumor fragments under the kidney capsule and treated with two-directional 200 kHz TTFields for 5 weeks.
- Outcomes included mouse lung surface metastases and lung weights at 1 or 7 days after treatment; rabbit MRI tumor volume, survival, and histological/immunohistochemical analysis of lung metastases.
- Statistical analysis used Student’s t-test, Chi-squared test, Log-Rank test, and a semi-quantitative score (0–5) for immune cell infiltration.
Limitations
- The paper states that the immune marker profile is not sufficient to prove a tumor-antigen-specific immune reaction, and that the microtubule/migration hypothesis was not directly tested; future experiments are warranted.
- The paper presents several possible explanations for reduced rabbit lung metastases—lower primary tumor load, inhibited migration into circulation, and systemic immune activation—without directly distinguishing among them.
- Evident from the text: this is a preclinical animal study only, with small subgroup samples (e.g., n = 12 for early-treatment lung metastasis analysis), and one reported result is internally inconsistent (“significantly lower” with P > 0.05).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the lung sections, a mononuclear cell infiltration was present around and within the metastases in all preparations.
“In the lung sections, it was noted in all preparations that a mononuclear cell infiltration was present around and within the metastases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean metastasis diameter was 1.4 mm per tumor cross-section in TTFields treated groups and 6.2 mm in the control group.
“Mean metastasis diameter was 1.4 mm per tumor cross-section in TTFields treated groups and 6.2 mm in the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When treatment was started later than 14 days from implantation, no difference was seen in the number of lung metastases between the groups.
“When treatment was started later than 14 days from implantation, no difference was seen in the number lung metastases between the groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average TTFields intensities in the lung were 0.5 V/cm, a fifth of the field intensity measured in the kidney.
“The average TTFields intensities in the lung were 0.5 V/cm which is a fifth of the field intensity measured in the kidney (see “Methods”).”
- Also stated in: § Metastases in rabbits · hedged
“The TTFields intensity in the lungs was about 20% of the fields’ intensity in the kidney (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Metastases in rabbits · hedged
- Findingown data
TTFields treated rabbits had significantly increased CD4, CD8, and CD45 T-cell counts compared to control.
“This investigation revealed that TTFields treated rabbits had significantly increased CD4, CD8, and CD45 T-cell counts (Table 1) as compared to control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
When mice were followed for an additional week after termination of TTFields treatment, the overall number of lung metastases was similar in TTFields and sham control animals: 18 ± 12 vs 17 ± 15, P = 0.87.
“When mice were followed for an additional week after termination of the TTField treatment, the overall number of lung metastases was similar in TTFields and sham control animals (18 ± 12 vs. 17 ± 15, respectively; P = 0.87)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average daily growth rate of TTFields treated tumors was significantly lower than that of sham controls: 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.5 ± 3.2, P = 0.003.
“The average daily growth rate of the TTFields treated tumors was also significantly lower than that of the sham controls (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 3.2, respectively; P = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average number of surface metastases per lung in the TTFields group was significantly lower than in sham controls: 1.5 ± 1 vs 10.3 ± 8.4, P < 0.01.
“The average number of surface metastases per lung in the TTFields group was significantly lower than in sham controls: 1.5 ± 1 compared to 10.3 ± 8.4, respectively (Fig. 2c; P < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average lung weight of TTFields treated mice was significantly lower than the average lung weight in the control group: 212 ± 10 vs 253 ± 20 mg, P < 0.01.
“The average lung weight of the TTFields treated animals was also significantly lower than the average lung weight in the control group (212 ± 10 vs. 253 ± 20 mg, respectively; P < 0.01; see Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The extent of mononuclear cell infiltration was more profound in TTFields treated rabbits compared to controls, with a mean score of 2.0 for the treatment group and 1.4 for the control group.
“The extent of this cell infiltration was more profound in TTFields treated rabbits compared to the controls with a mean score of 2.0 for the treatment group and 1.4 for the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The cells infiltrating the lung metastases in the TTFields group were CD4, CD8 and CD45 positive.
“we found that the cells infiltrating the lung metastases in the TTFields group were CD4, CD8 and CD45 positive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Continuous TTFields treatment for 7 days reduced the size and number of lung melanoma metastases at the end of treatment compared to sham controls.
“Continuous TTFields treatment for 7 days reduced the size and number of lung melanoma metastases at the end of treatment as compared to sham controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When treatment was initiated before day 14 from implantation (n = 12), a significantly lower number of lung metastases was seen in TTFields treated rabbits than in sham controls (Fig. 6c; P > 0.05).
“when treatment was initiated before day 14 from implantation (n = 12), a significantly lower number of lung metastases was seen in TTFields treated rabbits than in sham controls (Fig. 6c; P > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After the additional week, lung weights were practically identical between TTFields and sham control mice: 370 ± 28 vs 365 ± 40 mg, P = 0.79.
“and the lung weights were practically identical (370 ± 28 vs. 365 ± 40 mg, respectively; P = 0.79).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average tumor volume after treatment was half of the volume of untreated sham controls: 29.0 ± 18.5 vs 61.1 ± 38.5 cm3, P = 0.0011.
“The average tumor volume after treatment was half of the volume of untreated sham controls (29.0 ± 18.5 vs. 61.1 ± 38.5 cm3, respectively; P = 0.0011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treating the primary tumor with TTFields after day 15 from implantation resulted in a smaller difference between treated and control rabbits in the number of lung metastases.
“Here we report that treating the primary tumor with TTFields after day 15 from implantation resulted in a smaller difference between treated and control rabbit in the number of lung metastases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TTFields can inhibit the growth of VX-2 carcinoma in the kidneys of New Zealand white rabbits.
“In the present study we demonstrate that TTFields can inhibit the growth of VX-2 carcinoma in the kidneys of New Zealand white rabbits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TTFields application to animals and patients has almost no acute or chronic toxicity.
“The application of TTFields to animals and patients has been shown to have almost no acute or chronic toxicity [18, 20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):10152–10157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V et al (2009) Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields). BMC Med Phys 9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is an increase in metastatic spread of VX-2 tumors from the kidney between days 12 and 15 from implantation.
“there is an increase in metastatic spread of VX-2 tumors from the kidney between days 12 and 15 from implantation [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nakada SY, Jerde TJ, Warner T et al (2004) Comparison of cryotherapy and nephrectomy in treating implanted VX-2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys. BJU Int 94(4):632–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05015.x source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The baseline average tumor volume in sham control rabbits and treated rabbits was identical: 1.19 ± 1.1 vs 1.19 ± 1.0 cm3, P = 0.97.
“The baseline average tumor volume in the sham control rabbits and in treated rabbits was identical (1.19 ± 1.1 vs. 1.19 ± 1.0 cm3, respectively; P = 0.97).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A 0.5 V/cm field intensity measured in rabbit lungs is below the threshold required for cancerous cell growth inhibition.
“Such a 0.5 V/cm field intensity measured in the rabbit’ lungs is below the threshold required for cancerous cell growth inhibition [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64(9):3288–3295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0083 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The low intensity used (single volts per cm) does not cause significant heating within the body.
“In addition, the low intensity used (single volts per cm), does not cause significant heating within the body [18, 20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):10152–10157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V et al (2009) Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields). BMC Med Phys 9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
An additional explanation for the findings is the enhancement of a systemic immune response to the tumor cells.
“An additional explanation for our findings is the enhancement of a systemic immune response to the tumor cells. This option is supported by the results of the immunostaining assay performed on treated and sham control lungs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The extension in survival of TTFields treated rabbits was due to an inhibition of metastatic spread, seeding or growth in the lungs compared to controls.
“This extension in survival was found to be due to an inhibition of metastatic spread, seeding or growth in the lungs of TTFields treated rabbits compared to controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TTFields have the potential to inhibit the migration of metastases from a primary tumor.
“we have shown that TTFields have the potential to inhibit the migration of metastases from a primary tumor”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the mice lungs, the TTFields intensity was sufficiently large to induce inhibition of the metastasis.
“in the mice lungs the TTFields intensity was sufficiently large to induce inhibition of the metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observation that metastases renewed their growth in the lungs once TTFields application to the mice was terminated does not support immune response activation in the treated group.
“The observation that the metastases renewed their growth in the lungs, once the TTFields application to the mice was terminated, does not support immune response activation in the treated group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It seems more likely that the inhibition of metastases in the mice lungs was due to a direct inhibitory effect of the TTFields on the cancerous cells.
“It seems more likely that the inhibition of the metastases in the mice lungs was due to a direct inhibitory effect of the TTFields on the cancerous cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TTFields can inhibit the growth of metastases in the lungs once they have been seeded in the target organ, by the presence of the fields in the lungs themselves.
“can inhibit the growth of metastases in the lungs once they have been seeded in the target organ, by the presence of the fields in the lungs themselves”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TTFields may activate an anti-tumor antigen systemic immune response following treatment of a primary tumor.
“TTFields may activate an anti-tumor antigen systemic immune response following treatment of a primary tumor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The activation of the immune response in the rabbits' lungs was mediated by the TTFields treatment.
- May combine two claims. 10
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distribution of metastasis sizes differed significantly between the groups (P < 0.05, Chi-squared test), with a higher proportion of large metastases in the control group and a higher proportion of small metastases in the TTFields treated group.
“However, the distribution of metastasis sizes differed significantly between the groups (P < 0.05, Chi-squared test) with a higher proportion of large metastases seen in the control group, and a higher proportion of small metastases in the TTFields treated group (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMicroscopic scanning of histological slides showed the mean number of lung metastases per tumor cross-section was 11.8 in TTFields treated mice and 23.2 for the control group.
“The mean number of lung metastases per tumor cross-section was 11.8 in TTFields treated mice and 23.2 for the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe median survival of TTFields treated animals was 70 days, significantly longer than the 57 days of control animals (Log-Rank test; P < 0.05).
“The median survival of TTFields treated animals was 70 days which is significantly longer than the 57 days of the control animals (Log-Rank test; P < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong the intra-tumoral infiltrating cells, CD4 T-cells were more prevalent than CD8 T-cells.
“Among the intra-tumoral infiltrating cells, CD4 T-cells were more prevalent than CD8 T-cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of the immune infiltration was seen in the peri-tumoral location, but the most significant difference was the presence of abundant intra-tumoral infiltration in TTFields treated rabbits.
“Interestingly, though most of the immune infiltration was seen in the peri-tumoral location, the most significant difference was the presence of an abundant intra-tumoral infiltration in TTFields treated rabbits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA trend towards a lower number of large metastases (>3 mm in diameter) was seen in the TTFields treated group, but the difference did not reach significance (P = 0.11).
“A trend towards a lower number of large metastases (>3 mm in diameter) was also seen in TTFields treated group, however, here the difference did not reach significance (Fig. 6d; P = 0.11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTTFields slow tumor progression in animal cancer models and in patients with recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
“TTFields are low intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields that were shown to disrupt cancer cell replication in vitro and to slow tumor progression in animal cancer models and patients with recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma [18–20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):10152–10157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64(9):3288–3295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0083 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V et al (2009) Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields). BMC Med Phys 9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTTFields disrupt cancer cell replication in vitro.
“TTFields are low intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields that were shown to disrupt cancer cell replication in vitro and to slow tumor progression in animal cancer models and patients with recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma [18–20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):10152–10157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64(9):3288–3295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0083 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V et al (2009) Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields). BMC Med Phys 9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImmune response can inhibit the proliferation of cancerous cells or even eliminate them.
“It is becoming widely accepted that immune response can inhibit the proliferation of cancerous cell or even eliminate them (reviewed by Dunn et al. [23])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H et al (2002) Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol 3(11):991–998. doi: 10.1038/ni1102-991 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMigration of tumor cells into the circulation depends on the proper formation of microtubule-based processes in the migrating cells.
“Such migration is dependant on the proper formation of a microtubule based processes in the migrating cells [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Suresh S (2007) Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater 3(4):413–438. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe different size distribution between the groups suggests that metastases progression was inhibited in the TTFields group during treatment, an effect that may have been attenuated or partially lost after 1 week recovery.
“Furthermore, the different size distribution between the two groups suggests that the metastases progression was inhibited in the TTFields group during treatment, an effect which may have been attenuated or partially lost after 1 week recovery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSham electrode arrays for rabbits were provided with an electrical heating element to match the temperature generated on the skin by the TTFields treatment electrodes.
“Each sham electrode array was provided with an electrical heating element to match the temperature generated on the skin by the TTFields treatment electrodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTumor volume assessment by MRI was performed by a technician blinded to the group of each rabbit.
“Tumor volume assessment by MRI was performed by a technician blinded to the group of each rabbit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis milieu of immune markers indicates a T-cell mediated immune response; however, it is not yet sufficient to prove a tumor-antigen specific immune reaction.
“This milieu of immune markers indicates a T-cell mediated immune response; however, it is not yet sufficient to prove a tumor-antigen specific immune reaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenControl mice were treated with sham electrodes that were temperature and geometrically matched to the TTFields group.
“Control mice were treated by means of sham electrodes which were both temperature, and geometrically matched to the TTFields group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTTFields may be clinically useful not only in treatment of locally advanced tumors, but in prevention and treatment of metastatic disease as well.
“Therefore, TTFields may not only be clinically useful in treatment of locally advanced tumors, but in prevention and treatment of metastatic disease as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCD45 activation can induce the production of TNFα, which in turn activates a family of cell-surface receptors that can mediate cell death.
“Interestingly, CD45 activation can induce the production of TNFα [24] which in turn activates a family of cell-surface receptors that can mediate cell death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Hayes AL, Smith C, Foxwell BM et al (1999) CD45-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha production in monocytes is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent and nuclear factor-kappaB-independent. J Biol Chem 274(47):33455–33461. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33455 source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about the effect of TTFields on the metastatic spread of solid tumors.
“Yet, little is know about the effect of TTFields on the metastatic spread of solid tumors.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The activation of the immune response in the rabbits' lungs was mediated by the TTFields treatment.
“Assuming that the activation of the immune response in the rabbits’ lungs was mediated by the TTFields treatment”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The in vitro growth inhibitory observations of TTFields were confirmed in vivo in mice and rabbit tumor models.
“These in vitro observations could also be confirmed in vivo in mice and rabbit tumor models.8”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
TTFields have demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of solid tumors in vitro and in vivo.
“TTFields have demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of solid tumors in vitro and in vivo.[6][7][8][9][10]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rabbit histology result identifies treated animals as mice
MinorThe histological lung comparison appears in the rabbit-results section and contrasts treated animals with rabbit controls, but identifies the treated animals as mice.
“The mean number of lung metastases per tumor cross-section was 11.8 in TTFields treated mice and 23.2 for the control group.”
“Similar results were obtained by microscopic scanning of histological slides of lungs in TTFields treated versus sham control rabbits.”
Reported early rabbit treatment conflicts with the treatment schedule
MinorThe methods place baseline MRI two weeks after implantation and treatment on the following day, yet the results describe treatment beginning before day 14.
“when treatment was initiated before day 14 from implantation (n = 12)”
“Two weeks after tumor implantation, baseline MRI was performed to detect the presence of tumor and to assess its baseline volume. On the day following the baseline MRI, 4 electrode arrays each consisting of 9 insulated electrodes (2.85 mm2 each) connected in parallel were placed on torso of each tumor bearing animal of the treated group.”
Cites
Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape
Dunn, G. P., Bruce, A. T., Ikeda, H., Old, L. J., & Schreiber, R. D. (2002) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1102-991 · Cited by 5,393 · see citing works
The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth
Whiteside, T. L. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2008.271 · Cited by 2,376 · see citing works
Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: Prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases
Pastorino, U., Buyse, M. E., Friedel, G., Ginsberg, R. J., Girard, P., Goldstraw, P. G., Johnston, M. G., McCormack, P. M. E., Pass, H. I., & Putnam, J. B. (1997) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(97)70397-0 · Cited by 1,533 · see citing works
Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells☆
SURESH, S. (2007) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors
Kirson, E. D., Dbalý, V., Tovaryš, F., Vymazal, J., Soustiel, J. F., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Steinberg-Shapira, S., Gurvich, Z., Schneiderman, R., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702916104 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Self-citationDisruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields
Kirson, E. D., Gurvich, Z., Schneiderman, R., Dekel, E., Itzhaki, A., Wasserman, Y., Schatzberger, R., & Palti, Y. (2004) · Cancer research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Self-citationBillingsley, K. G., Burt, M. E., Jara, E., Ginsberg, R. J., Woodruff, J. M., Leung, D. H. Y., & Brennan, M. F. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199905000-00002 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
The anticancer immune response: indispensable for therapeutic success?
Zitvogel, L., Apétoh, L., Ghiringhelli, F., André, F., Tesnière, A., & Kroemer, G. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci35180 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Kirson, E. D., Schneiderman, R. S., Dbalý, V., Tovaryš, F., Vymazal, J., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Gurvich, Z., Shmueli, E., Goldsher, D., et al. (2009) · BMC Medical Physics · doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationD. G. C. I. N. (German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemo-Immunotherapy Trials Group), Atzpodien, J., Kirchner, H. H., Illiger, H. J., Metzner, B., Ukena, D., Schott, H., Funke, P.-J., Gramatzki, M., von Jürgenson, S., et al. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.2076 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Lung Cancer and Radiofrequency Ablation
Rose, S. C., Thistlethwaite, P. A., Sewell, P. E., & Vance, R. B. (2006) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000222707.44902.66 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
vanSonnenberg, E., Shankar, S., Morrison, P. R., Nair, R. T., Silverman, S. G., Jaklitsch, M. T., Liu, F., Cheung, L. K., Tuncali, K., Skarin, A. T., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840381 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF ANAESTHESIA AND SURGERY ON IMMUNE STATUS
Walton, B. (1979) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/51.1.37 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Friedel, G., Pastorino, U., Buyse, M. E., Ginsberg, R. J., Girard, P., Goldstraw, P. G., Johnston, M., McCormack, P. M. E., Pass, H. I., Putnam, J. B., et al. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Surgical Therapy of Lung Metastases
Sternberg, D. I., & Sonett, J. R. (2007) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.03.004 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Hayes, A. L., Smith, C., Foxwell, B. M. J., & Brennan, F. M. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.47.33455 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Prognostic analysis of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma
Zhang, S., Zeng, Z., Tang, Z., Sun, J., Cheng, J., Liu, R., Wang, P., & Zhang, B. (2008) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-008-9052-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Pulmonary Metastases of Endocrine Origin
Khan, J. H., McElhinney, D. B., Rahman, S. B., George, T. I., Clark, O. H., & Merrick, S. H. (1998) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.114.2.526 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Radiofrequency ablation in lung cancer: promising results in safety and efficacy.
Suh, R. D., Reckamp, K. L., Zeidler, M. R., & Cameron, R. B. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Can cancer chemotherapy enhance the malignant behaviour of tumours?
McMillan, T. J., & Hart, I. R. (1987) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00047465 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Lung Metastases And Isolated Lung Perfusion
Schil, P. E. V. (2013) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Comparison of cryotherapy and nephrectomy in treating implanted VX‐2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys
Nakada, S. Y., Jerde, T. J., Warner, T., & Lee, F. T. (2004) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05015.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Experience of hormonal therapy with anastrozole for previously treated metastatic breast cancer.
Lavrenkov, K., Man, S., Geffen, D. B., & Cohen, Y. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sardari N, Colpaert C (2007) Lung metastases: epidemiology, clinical presentation and imaging. In: Schil P (ed) Lung metastases and isolated lung perfusion. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 3–25
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tumor-Treating Fields: A Fourth Modality in Cancer Treatment
Mun, E. J., Babiker, H. M., Weinberg, U., Kirson, E. D., & Von Hoff, D. D. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1117 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Self-citationTumour treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: current advances and future directions
Rominiyi, O., Vanderlinden, A., Clenton, S. J., Bridgewater, C. H., Al-Tamimi, Y., & Collis, S. J. (2020) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01136-5 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Tumor Treating Fields Perturb the Localization of Septins and Cause Aberrant Mitotic Exit
Gera, N., Yang, A., Holtzman, T. S., Lee, S. X., Wong, E. T., & Swanson, K. D. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125269 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: A new frontier in cancer therapy
Davies, A. M., Weinberg, U., & Palti, Y. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12112 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationVoloshin, T., Kaynan, N., Davidi, S., Porat, Y., Shteingauz, A., Schneiderman, R. S., Zeevi, E., Munster, M., Blat, R., Tempel-Brami, C., et al. (2020) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02534-7 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors
Hottinger, A. F., Pacheco, P., & Stupp, R. (2016) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now182 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Chen, D., Le, S. B., Hutchinson, T. E., Calinescu, A.-A., Sebastian, M., Jin, D., Liu, T., Ghiaseddin, A. P., Rahman, M., & Tran, D. D. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci149258 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields inhibit glioblastoma cell migration, invasion and angiogenesis
Kim, E. H., Song, H. S., Yoo, S., & Yoon, M. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11372 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Cancer cell proliferation is inhibited by specific modulation frequencies
Zimmerman, J. W., Pennison, M. J., Brezovich, I. A., Yi, N., Yang, C. T., Ramaker, R. C., Absher, D., Myers, R., Kuster, N., Costa, F. P., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.523 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Karanam, N. K., Kalayarasan, S., Ding, L., Sishc, B. J., Saha, D., & Story, M. D. (2017) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.136 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Giladi, M., Weinberg, U., Schneiderman, R. S., Porat, Y., Munster, M., Voloshin, T., Blatt, R., Cahal, S., Itzhaki, A., Onn, A., et al. (2014) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.006 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting the electric field distribution in the brain for the treatment of glioblastoma
Miranda, P. C., Mekonnen, A., Salvador, R., & Basser, P. J. (2014) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4137 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Wenger, C., Miranda, P. C., Salvador, R., Thielscher, A., Bomzon, Z., Giladi, M., Mrugala, M. M., & Korshoej, A. R. (2018) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2017.2765282 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Mechanisms of Action of Tumor Treating Fields
Moser, J. C., Salvador, E., Deniz, K., Swanson, K. D., Tuszyński, J. A., Carlson, K. W., Karanam, N. K., Patel, C. B., Story, M. D., Lou, E., et al. (2022) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0887 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Biological activity of tumor-treating fields in preclinical glioma models
Silginer, M., Weller, M., Stupp, R., & Roth, P. (2017) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.171 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Costa, F. P., de Oliveira, A. C., Meirelles, R. F., Machado, M. C. C., Zanesco, T., Surjan, R. C. T., Chammas, M. C., Rocha, M. D. S., Morgan, D. E., Cantor, A. B., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.292 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Pless, M., Droege, C., von Moos, R., Salzberg, M. O., & Betticher, D. C. (2013) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.025 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Tumor Treating Fields in the Management of Patients with Malignant Gliomas
Ghiaseddin, A. P., Shin, D. H., Melnick, K. F., & Tran, D. D. (2020) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-020-00773-5 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Giladi, M., Schneiderman, R. S., Porat, Y., Munster, M., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Cahal, S., Kirson, E. D., Weinberg, U., & Palti, Y. (2014) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.11.009 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Overview of Sub-Cellular Mechanisms Involved in the Action of TTFields
Tuszynski, J., Wenger, C., Friesen, D., & Preto, J. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13111128 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Voloshin, T., Schneiderman, R. S., Volodin, A., Shamir, R. R., Kaynan, N., Zeevi, E., Koren, L., Klein-Goldberg, A., Paz, R., Giladi, M., et al. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12103016 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent Advances in the Therapeutic Strategies of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Aldoghachi, A. F., Aldoghachi, A. F., Breyne, K., Ling, K., & Cheah, P.-S. (2022) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.03.030 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Glioblastoma Therapy in the Age of Molecular Medicine
Geraldo, L. H., Garcia, C., da Fonseca, A. C. C., Dubois, L. G., Spohr, T. C. L. D. S. E., Matias, D., Magalhães, E. S. D. C., do Amaral, R. F., da Rosa, B. G., Grimaldi, I., et al. (2018) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2018.11.002 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Kim, E. H., Kim, Y. J., Song, H. S., Jeong, Y. K., Lee, J. Y., Sung, J., Yoo, S., & Yoon, M. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11407 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Liquid metal enabled injectable biomedical technologies and applications
Sun, X., Yuan, B., Sheng, L., Rao, W., & Liu, J. (2020) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100722 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: concept, evidence and future
Pless, M., & Weinberg, U. (2011) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1517/13543784.2011.583236 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Tumor-Treating Fields in Glioblastomas: Past, Present, and Future
Guo, X., Yang, X., Wu, J., Yang, H., Li, Y., Li, J., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Xing, H., Liu, P., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14153669 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Swanson, K. D., Lok, E., & Wong, E. T. (2016) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-015-0606-5 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Mittal, S., Klinger, N. V., Michelhaugh, S. K., Barger, G. R., Pannullo, S. C., & Juhász, C. (2017) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2016.9.jns16452 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Schneiderman, R. S., Shmueli, E., Kirson, E. D., & Palti, Y. (2010) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-229 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationBioelectromagnetic medicine: The role of resonance signaling
Foletti, A., Grimaldi, S., Lisi, A., Ledda, M., & Liboff, A. R. (2013) · Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine · doi:10.3109/15368378.2012.743908 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Alternating Electric Fields (TTFields) Activate Cav1.2 Channels in Human Glioblastoma Cells
Neuhaus, E., Zirjacks, L., Ganser, K., Klumpp, L., Schüler, U., Zips, D., Eckert, F., & Huber, S. M. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11010110 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Li, X., Yang, F., & Rubinsky, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2020.2965883 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Tanzhu, G., Chen, L., Xiao, G., Shi, W., Peng, H., Chen, D., & Zhou, R. (2022) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-022-01206-y · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The distinguishing electrical properties of cancer cells
Gregorio, E. D., Israel, S. L., Staelens, M., Tankel, G., Shankar, K., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2022) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2022.09.003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Recent advances in Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma
Khagi, S., Kotecha, R. R., Gatson, N. T., Jeyapalan, S. A., Abdullah, H. I., Avgeropoulos, N. G., Batzianouli, E., Giladi, M., Lustgarten, L., & Goldlust, S. A. (2024) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyae227 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationKaranam, N. K., & Story, M. D. (2020) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553002.2020.1837984 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Gutin, P. H., & Wong, E. T. (2012) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.14694/edbook_am.2012.32.122 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Progress and prospect in tumor treating fields treatment of glioblastoma
Liu, S., Shi, W., Zhao, Q., Zheng, Z., Liu, Z., Meng, L., Dong, L., & Jiang, X. M. (2021) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111810 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: a new approach to glioblastoma therapy
Rick, J. W., Chandra, A., & Aghi, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-018-2768-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Electromagnetic field investigation on different cancer cell lines
Filipović, N., Djukic, T. R., Radovic, M. D., Cvetković, D. M., Milutinović, M. G., Marković, S., Peulić, A. S., & Jeremic, B. M. (2014) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-014-0084-x · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Wu, H., Yang, L., Liu, H., Zhou, D., Chen, D., Zheng, X., Yang, H., Li, C., Chang, J., Wu, A., et al. (2021) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.13750 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Tumor Treating Fields: At the Crossroads Between Physics and Biology for Cancer Treatment
Carrieri, F. A., Smack, C., Siddiqui, I., Kleinberg, L. R., & Tran, P. T. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.575992 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Babiker, H. M., Picozzi, V. J., Chandana, S. R., Melichar, B., Kasi, A., Gang, J., Gallego, J., Bullock, A., Chunyi, H., Wyrwicz, L. S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco-25-00746 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Trusheim, J. E., Dunbar, E. M., Battiste, J. D., IWAMOTO, F. M., Mohile, N. A., Damek, D., Bota, D. A., & Connelly, J. (2016) · CNS Oncology · doi:10.2217/cns-2016-0032 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Lee, Y., Seo, H. W., Baek, J.-H., Lim, S. H., Hwang, S., & Kim, E. H. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68473-6 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Barsheshet, Y., Voloshin, T., Brant, B., Cohen, G., Koren, L., Blatt, R., Cahal, S., Khalil, T. H., Tov, E. Z., Paz, R., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232214073 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationElectrical stimulation towards melanoma therapy via liquid metal printed electronics on skin
Li, J., Guo, C., Wang, Z., Gao, K., Shi, X., & Liu, J. (2016) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s40169-016-0102-9 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Curley, S. A., Palalon, F., Sanders, K., & Koshkina, N. V. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110909142 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Modeling Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) application in single cells during metaphase and telophase
Wenger, C., Giladi, M., Bomzon, Z., Salvador, R., Basser, P. J., & Miranda, P. C. (2015) · 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7319977 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, J., Shi, K., Drechsler, M., Tang, B. Z., Huang, J., & Yan, Y. (2016) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c6cc06432a · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Li, X., Liu, K., Xing, L., & Rubinsky, B. (2023) · Radiology and Oncology · doi:10.2478/raon-2023-0044 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Li, D., Xu, X., Xiao, B., Piao, Y., Xiang, J., Shao, S., Ho, F. C.-Y., et al. (2023) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.10.004 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Benson, L. M. (2018) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.005 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Electromagnetic fields alter the motility of metastatic breast cancer cells
Garg, A. A., Jones, T. H., Moss, S. M., Mishra, S., Kaul, K., Ahirwar, D. K., Ferree, J., Kumar, P., Subramaniam, D. S., Ganju, R. K., et al. (2019) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0550-z · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Tumor-Treating Fields: A fourth modality in cancer treatment, new practice updates
Arvind, R., Chandana, S. R., Borad, M. J., Pennington, D., Mody, K., & Babiker, H. M. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103535 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Inui, T., Amitani, H., Kubo, K., Kuchiike, D., Uto, Y., Nishikata, T., & Mette, M. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 36 · see citing works
An Evidence-Based Review of Alternating Electric Fields Therapy for Malignant Gliomas
Wong, E. T., Lok, E., & Swanson, K. D. (2015) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-015-0353-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: a comprehensive overview of the underlying molecular mechanism
Hong, P., Kudulaiti, N., Wu, S., Nie, J., & Zhuang, D. (2021) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2022.2017283 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Tumour treating fields in a combinational therapeutic approach
Branter, J., Basu, S., & Smith, S. J. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26344 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Regev, O., Merkin, V., Blumenthal, D. T., Melamed, I., & Kaisman‐Elbaz, T. (2021) · Neuro-Oncology Practice · doi:10.1093/nop/npab026 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Campana, L. G., DAUD, A. I., Lancellotti, F., Arroyo, J. P., Davalos, R. V., Prata, C. D., & Gehl, J. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15133340 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
On the origin of cancer: Can we ignore coherence?
Plankar, M., Jerman, I., & Krašovec, R. (2011) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.04.001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Pandey, M. K., & Ballo, M. T. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0603 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
T Cells Retain Pivotal Antitumoral Functions under Tumor-Treating Electric Fields
Diamant, G., Simchony, H., Gasri-Plotnitsky, L., Roitman, M., Shiloach, T., Levin, A. G., Eshhar, Z., Haim, O., Pencovich, N., Grossman, R., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2100100 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Shams, S., & Patel, C. B. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjac047 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Noninvasive radiofrequency treatment effect on mitochondria in pancreatic cancer cells
Curley, S. A., Palalon, F., Lu, X., & Koshkina, N. V. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28895 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields therapy device for glioblastoma: physics and clinical practice considerations
Lok, E., Swanson, K. D., & Wong, E. T. (2015) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2015.1086641 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Selective toxicity of tumor treating fields to melanoma: an in vitro and in vivo study
Jo, Y., Hwang, S., Jin, Y. B., Sung, J., Jeong, Y. K., Baek, J. H., Cho, J.-M., Kim, E. H., & Yoon, M. (2018) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-018-0106-x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Churchill, C. D. M., Winter, P., Tuszyński, J. A., & Levin, M. G. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.12.003 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Pohling, C., Nguyen, H., Chang, E., Schubert, K. E., Nie, Y., Bashkirov, V. A., Yamamoto, V. N., Zeng, Y., Stupp, R., Schulte, R. W., et al. (2022) · Bioelectrochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108287 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Zhong, S., Yao, S., Zhao, Q., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Li, L., & Wang, Z. L. (2022) · Advanced NanoBiomed Research · doi:10.1002/anbr.202200143 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Human Health: Recent Advances and Future
Liu, X., Yan, X., Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Win, T., & Ren, L. (2021) · Journal of Bionic Engineering · doi:10.1007/s42235-021-0015-1 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Han, Q., Chen, R., Wang, F., Chen, S., Sun, X., Guan, X., Yao, Y., Peng, B., Pan, X., Li, J., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192888 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Evaluation of a tumor electric field treatment system in a rat model of glioma
Wu, H., Wang, C., Liu, J., Zhou, D., Chen, D., Liu, Z., Wu, A., Yang, L., Chang, J., Luo, C., et al. (2020) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.13441 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Nishikawa, R., Yamasaki, F., Arakawa, Y., Muragaki, Y., Narita, Y., Tanaka, S., Yamaguchi, S., Mukasa, A., & Kanamori, M. (2023) · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyad001 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Pulsed electromagnetic therapy in cancer treatment: Progress and outlook
Xu, W., Xie, X., Wu, H., Wang, X., Cai, J., Xu, Z., & Shiju, E. (2022) · Open Research (University of Surrey) · doi:10.1002/viw.20220029 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Inhibition of brain tumor cell proliferation by alternating electric fields
Jeong, H., Sung, J., Oh, S.-I., Jeong, S. H., Koh, E. K., Hong, S., & Yoon, M. (2014) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4902112 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mujib, S. A., Alamsyah, F., & Taruno, W. P. (2017) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000485186 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Wong, E. T., Lok, E., & Swanson, K. D. (2018) · Progress in neurological surgery · doi:10.1159/000469690 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Revolutionizing Brain Tumor Care: Emerging Technologies and Strategies
Nguyen, T. T. T., Greene, L. A., Mnatsakanyan, H., & Badr, C. E. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12061376 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: An emerging treatment modality for thoracic and abdominal cavity cancers
Jones, T. H., Song, J. W., & Abushahin, L. I. (2021) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101296 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tumor Treating Fields: killing two birds with one stone
Lee, J., Grabowski, M. M., & Lathia, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci159073 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tumor-Treating Fields Inhibit the Metastatic Potential of Osteosarcoma Cells
Oh, J. Y., Lee, Y., & Kim, E. H. (2020) · Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · doi:10.1177/1533033820947481 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rafiq, Z., Kang, M., Barsoumian, H. B., Manzar, G. S., Hu, Y. H., Leuschner, C., Huang, A., Masrorpour, F., Lu, W., Puebla‐Osorio, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-025-03281-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Butters, J. T., Figueroa, X. A., & Butters, B. M. (2014) · Open Journal of Biophysics · doi:10.4236/ojbiphy.2014.44015 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Modelling Tumor Treating Fields for the treatment of lung-based tumors
Bomzon, Z., Urman, N., Wenger, C., Giladi, M., Weinberg, U., Wasserman, Y., Kirson, E. D., Miranda, P. C., & Palti, Y. (2015) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7319976 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, H., Liu, R., Liu, J., & Tang, J. T. (2012) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/147323001204000109 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Immunotherapy Against Gliomas: is the Breakthrough Near?
Lukas, R. V., Wainwright, D. A., Horbinski, C., IWAMOTO, F. M., & Sonabend, A. M. (2019) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-019-01203-z · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Jo, Y., Han, Y. I., Lee, E., Seo, J., Oh, G., Sung, H., Gi, Y., Kim, H., Park, S., & Yoon, M. (2022) · PubMed Central · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Le, H. T., Staelens, M., Lazzari, D., Chan, G. K. T., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11172712 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Modulation Effect in Oncothermia
Szász, O., Andócs, G., & Meggyesházi, N. (2013) · Conference Papers in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2013/398678 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Theory and application of TTFields in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Yu, A., Zeng, J., Yu, J., Cao, S., & Li, A. (2024) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14563 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Smothers, A. R., Henderson, J. R., O’Connell, J. J., Stenbeck, J. M., Dean, D. M. D., Harvey, T. G., & Booth, B. W. (2023) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-023-00647-w · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Research Progress on the Mechanism of Anti-Tumor Immune Response Induced by TTFields
Lan, Y., Zhang, S., Pan, Y., Wang, M., & Chen, G. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15235642 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lan, J., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Liu, H., Feng, Y., Liu, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14720 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pratiwi, R., Antara, N. Y., Fadliansyah, L. G., Ardiansyah, S. A., Nurhidayat, L., Sholikhah, E. N., Sunarti, S., Widyarini, S., Fadhlurrahman, A. G., Fatmasari, H., et al. (2019) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.20727.1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Dieper, A., Scheidegger, S., Füchslin, R. M., Veltsista, P. D., Stein, U., Weyland, M. S., Gerster, D., Beck, M., Bengtsson, O., Zips, D., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.1080/02656736.2024.2379992 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Modulation of Tumor-Treating Fields by Cerebral Edema from Brain Tumors
Lok, E., Clark, M. M., Liang, O., Malik, T., Koo, S., & Wong, E. T. (2022) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2022.101046 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Clinical Application of Tumor Treating Fields Therapy in Glioblastoma
Riley, M. M., San, P., Lok, E., Swanson, K. D., & Wong, E. T. (2019) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/58937 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kirson, E. D., Giladi, M., Gurvich, Z., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Schneiderman, R. S., Wasserman, Y., Ryffel, B., Goldsher, D., & Palti, Y.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Kirson, Eilon D.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
- Published
- 2009-04-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 633-640
- ISSN
- 0262-0898 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7276
- PMC
- PMC2776150
- OpenAlex
- W2168283594
- Semantic Scholar
- 4051989aa1fcef3c6a3dfb9e2be36c2583479e5c
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Clinical & Experimental Metastasis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Keywords
- tumor treating fields, AC electric field, lung metastasis, melanoma, tumor growth inhibition, immune cell infiltration, survival extension, cancer prevention
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Electricity, Female, Lung Neoplasms, Melanoma, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Transplantation, Rabbits, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review