Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy

Arumainayagam, Nimalan, McGrath, John, Jefferson, Kieran P., Gillatt, David A.·2008·BJU International

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for the peri‐operative management of patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), which was started at our institution on 1 October 2005, as RC is associated with increased morbidity and longer inpatient stays than other major urological procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An ERP was introduced in our institution that focused on reduced bowel preparation, and standardized feeding and analgesic regimens. In all, 112 consecutive patients were compared, i.e. 56 before implementing the ERP and 56 since introducing the ERP. The primary outcome measures were duration of total inpatient stay and interval from surgery to discharge, and the morbidity and mortality. Data were analysed retrospectively from cancer network and hospital records. RESULTS: The demographics of the two groups showed no significant difference in age, gender distribution, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, or type of urinary diversion. Re‐admission, mortality and morbidity rates showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. The median (interquartile range) duration of hospital stay was 17 (15–23) days in the no‐ERP group, and 13 (11–17) days in the ERP group (significantly different, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test). The median duration of recovery after RC was 15 (13–21) days in the no‐ERP group and 12 (10–15) days in the ERP group (significantly different, P = 0.001, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test). CONCLUSION: The introduction of an ERP was associated with significantly reduced hospital stay, with no deleterious effect on morbidity or mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07319.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Arumainayagam, N., McGrath, J., Jefferson, K. P., & Gillatt, D. A.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01-08
Volume
101
Issue
6
Pages
698-701
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W2080347356
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07319.x
The paper
Arumainayagam, N., McGrath, J., Jefferson, K. P., & Gillatt, D. A. (2008). Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07319.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.