The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high‐grade upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma
Abstract
Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Accurate preoperative staging for upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) lesions is presently limited. Urinary cytology has shown promise for characterizing pathological features of bladder cancer. The role of cytology for UTUC is at present poorly defined. In this large multi‐institutional cohort of patients, urinary cytology was limited in its ability to accurately predict the grade and stage of upper‐tract lesions. Selective ureteral sampling improved the diagnostic accuracy of cytology when compared to bladder specimens. Improved preoperative surrogate markers for staging UTUC remain necessary. OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology for detecting aggressive disease in a multi‐institutional cohort of patients undergoing extirpative surgery for upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: • We reviewed the records of 326 patients with urinary cytology data who underwent a radical nephroureterectomy or distal ureterectomy without concurrent or previous bladder cancer. • We assessed the association of cytology (positive, negative and atypical) with final pathology. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of a positive (± atypical) cytology for high‐grade and muscle‐invasive UTUC was calculated. RESULTS: • On final pathology, 53% of patients had non‐muscle invasive disease (pTa, pTis, pT1) and 47% had invasive disease (≥pT2). Low‐grade and high‐grade cancers were present in 33% and 67% of patients, respectively. • Positive, atypical and negative urine cytology was noted in 40%, 40% and 20% of cases. Positive urinary cytology had sensitivity and PPV of 56% and 54% for high‐grade and 62% and 44% for muscle‐invasive UTUC. • Inclusion of atypical cytology with positive cytology improved the sensitivity and PPV for high‐grade (74% and 63%) and muscle‐invasive (77% and 45%) UTUC. Restricting analysis to patients with selective ureteral cytologies further improved the diagnostic accuracy when compared with bladder specimens (PPV > 85% for high‐grade and muscle‐invasive UTUC). CONCLUSIONS: • In this cohort of patients with UTUC treated with radical surgery, urine cytology in isolation lacked performance characteristics to accurately predict muscle‐invasive or high‐grade disease. • Improved surrogate markers for pathological grade and stage are necessary, particularly when considering endoscopic modalities for UTUC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Huang, W. C., Levey, A. S., Serio, A. M., Snyder, M., Vickers, A. J., Raj, G. V., Scardino, P. T., & Russo, P. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70803-8 · Cited by 1,613
Margulis, V., Shariat, S. F., Matin, S. F., Kamat, A. M., Zigeuner, R., Kikuchi, E., Lotan, Y., Weizer, A., Raman, J. D., Wood, C. G., et al. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24135 · Cited by 1,133
Self-citationLotan, Y., & Roehrborn, C. G. (2003) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02136-2 · Cited by 474
Self-citationCOMPARISON OF SCREENING METHODS IN THE DETECTION OF BLADDER CANCER
RAMAKUMAR, S., BHUIYAN, J., BESSE, J. A., ROBERTS, S. G., WOLLAN, P. C., BLUTE, M. L., & O'KANE, D. J. (1999) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61899-8 · Cited by 335
Brien, J. C., Shariat, S. F., Herman, M. P., Ng, C. K., Scherr, D. S., Scoll, B., Uzzo, R. G., Wille, M., Eggener, S. E., Terrell, J. D., et al. (2010) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.030 · Cited by 251
Self-citationNovara, G., De Marco, V., Gottardo, F., Dalpiaz, O., Bouygues, V., Galfano, A., Martignoni, G., Patard, J. J., Artibani, W., & Ficarra, V. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22970 · Cited by 193
Garbar, C., Mascaux, C., & Wespes, E. (2007) · Cytopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00426.x · Cited by 49
Cited by
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update
Rouprêt, M., Babjuk, M., Compérat, E., Zigeuner, R., Sylvester, R. J., Burger, M., Cowan, N. C., Gontero, P., Van Rhijn, B. W. G., Mostafid, A. H., et al. (2018) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationBladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Powles, T., Bellmunt, J., Comperat, E., De Santis, M., Huddart, R., Loriot, Y., Necchi, A., Valderrama, B. P., Ravaud, A., Shariat, S. F., et al. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012 · Cited by 555
Self-citationEuropean Guidelines on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: 2013 Update
Rouprêt, M., Babjuk, M., Compérat, E., Zigeuner, R., Sylvester, R., Burger, M., Cowan, N., Böhle, A., Van Rhijn, B. W. G., Kaasinen, E., et al. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.032 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Messer, J., Shariat, S. F., Brien, J. C., Herman, M. P., Ng, C. K., Scherr, D. S., Scoll, B., Uzzo, R. G., Wille, M., Eggener, S. E., Steinberg, G., Terrell, J. D., Lucas, S. M., Lotan, Y., Boorjian, S. A., & Raman, J. D.
- Venue
- BJU International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-14
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 701-705
- ISSN
- 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-410X
- OpenAlex
- W1728315824
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high‐grade upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09899.x
- The paper
- Messer, J., Shariat, S. F., Brien, J. C., Herman, M. P., Ng, C. K., Scherr, D. S., Scoll, B., Uzzo, R. G., Wille, M., Eggener, S. E., Steinberg, G., Terrell, J. D., Lucas, S. M., Lotan, Y., Boorjian, S. A., & Raman, J. D. (2011). Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high‐grade upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09899.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.