CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Role of attribution in affective responses to a partnered sexual situation among sexually dysfunctional men

Rowland, David L., Myers, Amy L., Adamski, Beth A., Burnett, Arthur L.·2013·BJU International
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11347.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (qualitative) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Sexually dysfunctional men report higher negative affect and lower positive affect than sexually functional men. Furthermore, men with sexual problems tend to make internal, self-blaming, attributions for negative sexual events, which can result in a diminished sense of self-efficacy and cause men to expect similar negative outcomes across future sexual situations. This pattern may sustain and actually intensify the sexual problem. This study shows that causal attributions for dysfunctional response influence emotional response to a partnered sexual situation. Specifically, sexually dysfunctional men who attribute their problem to a medical condition do better emotionally than those who attribute the problem to unknown or psychological factors - and this attribution process is a more powerful and reliable predictor of emotional response than the man's actual diagnosed somatic risk for a sexual problem. Furthermore, the study strongly suggests that those men who attribute their problem to a physical/medical issue are able to 'externalize' it - needing to assume less responsibility for and/or control over it, thereby reducing their psychological burden. These findings indicate not only that communication between physician and patient regarding the aetiology of a sexual problem may be critically important but also that, at least for some patients, pharmacological treatment should be combined with strategies that promote the development of internal positive self-serving attributions surrounding sexual activity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors that influence sexually dysfunctional men's emotional response within a partnered sexual situation, and, most specifically, whether they attribute their dysfunctional response to a specific biomedical cause vs a psychological or unknown cause. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on a sample of 59 sexually dysfunctional men visiting a urology clinic, linear regression was used to determine the relationship between patients' attributions and five global affective factors derived through principal components analysis: apprehension, insecure, arousable, affection, and pleasant. Two other covariates were included: actual (diagnosed) somatic risk as determined by the patient's medical history and clinician's notes, and the patient's self-reported importance of sexual intimacy. RESULTS: Attribution (biomedical vs psychological/unknown) had significant effects on three psycho-affective factors (insecure, arousable, affection); men who attributed their problem to a biomedical cause had higher positive affect and lower insecurity. Diagnosed somatic risk was significant for insecure and marginally for affection. Importance of sex was significant on four psycho-affective variables (insecure, arousable, pleasant, affection), with higher endorsement associated with higher insecurity and lower positive affect. CONCLUSIONS: Men who can attribute their sexual dysfunction to a medical condition do much better emotionally (higher positive affect and lower negative affect) than those who attribute the problem to unknown or psychological factors - and this factor is more predictive of their emotionality than the patient's actual somatic risk for sexual dysfunction. As demonstrated in a previous analysis, higher ratings of the importance of sex independently predicted stronger negative affect for men experiencing sexual problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11347.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Rowland, D. L., Myers, A. L., Adamski, B. A., & Burnett, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Valparaiso University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Rowland, David L.
ORCID
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-03
Volume
111
Issue
3b
Pages
E103-9
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
DOI
10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11347.x
OpenAlex
W1600283304
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • British Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
causal attribution, self-serving attribution, emotional responses, sexual intimacy, self-efficacy, physician-patient communication, urology patients, sexual dysfunction treatment, psychological burden, positive affect, negative affect, insecurity, arousal, affection, psychological risk
MeSH terms
Affect, Attitude to Health, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review