Cited by 10Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attribution patterns in men with sexual problems: analysis and implications for treatment

Rowland, David L., Kostelyk, Katie A., Tempel, Aaron R.·2016·Sexual and Relationship Therapy

Abstract

Previous research indicates that individuals with sexual problems are more likely to attribute negative sexual experiences to themselves, in contrast with sexually functional individuals who attribute negative experiences to external factors such as their partner, circumstance, or relationship. Both men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and men with premature ejaculation (PE) show such patterns, as demonstrated through separate studies. In this analysis of 1249 men responding to an online survey posted on the Internet, we undertook a head-to-head comparison of men with ED and PE problems to determine whether their attribution patterns, though clearly different from functional men, were also different from one another. We also compared men with combined PE and ED to men with just PE to ascertain whether patterns of self-blame in these men were greater. Results indicate that men with PE accepted a higher level of self-blame than men with ED for negative sexual experiences. Men with both PE and ED exhibited slightly stronger attribution patterns of self-blame. These results point out similarities and differences in attribution styles across men with various sexual problems, indicate that men with sexual problems may be vulnerable to self-fulfilling prophecies regarding any negative sexual experience, and suggest focal points for therapeutic strategies in helping such men to overcome negative self-perceptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14681994.2015.1126669

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rowland, D. L., Kostelyk, K. A., & Tempel, A. R.
Affiliations
Valparaiso University (US)
Corresponding author
Rowland, David L.
Venue
Sexual and Relationship Therapy
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
148-158
ISSN
  • 1468-1749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1994
OpenAlex
W2220539354
Cited by
10
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual & Relationship Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
attribution theory, self-blame, erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, self-fulfilling prophecy, sexual self-perception, therapeutic implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review