Perimenstrual Symptoms in Women with Diabetes Mellitus and the Relationship to Diabetic Control
Abstract
Four hundred and six insulin-dependent diabetic women completed a Menstrual Health Questionnaire published in Balance. Sixty-seven percent of women experienced changes in blood glucose levels or glycosuria premenstrually and 70% during the menstrual phase. Changes were more common in women who regarded themselves as suffering from premenstrual syndrome. Those experiencing premenstrual craving for sweet foods tended to have higher blood glucose levels or more glycosuria at those times. This may be a consequence of some women indulging their craving. Premenstrual symptoms were not caused by hypoglycaemia. When compared with age-matched non-diabetic women responding to a similar questionnaire, the diabetic women had a later menarche and, among those not on steroidal contraceptives, were more likely to report very irregular menstrual cycles. Among those regarding themselves as sufferers of premenstrual syndrome, diabetic women had less severe premenstrual symptoms than non-diabetic women. When women from these two self-designated premenstrual [corrected] syndrome suffering groups were matched for severity of premenstrual depression, differences still persisted in the severity of some symptoms perimenstrually, raising the possibility that in some way diabetes may alter women's experience of menstrual cycle-related symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies found no statistically significant differences in insulin sensitivity across phases of the menstrual cycle in women with type 1 diabetes, estimated by IGIT or euglycaemic clamp.
“two studies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] show the absence of SS differences in IS in the various phases of the MC, estimated by IGIT or the euglycaemic clamp.”
From Menstrual Cycle, Glucose Control and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
A number of variables and determinants (e.g., carbohydrate intake, physical activity, premenstrual syndrome symptoms, sleep quality and quantity) have to be considered when monitoring patients over a medium-to-long period.
“the number of variables and determinants to be considered when monitoring patients over a medium-to-long period (i.e., carbohydrate intake, the frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity, premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms and the quality and quantity of sleep) [8,9,10,11]”
From Menstrual Cycle, Glucose Control and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Alterations in Glucose Metabolism During Menstrual Cycle in Women With IDDM
Widom, B., Diamond, M. P., & Simonson, D. C. (1992) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.15.2.213 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Insulin Action Does Not Change During the Menstrual Cycle in Normal Women*
TOTH, E. L., SUTHIJUMROON, A., CROCKFORD, P. M., & RYAN, E. A. (1987) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-64-1-74 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Female reproduction and type 1 diabetes: From mechanisms to clinical findings
Codner, E., Merino, P. M., & Tena-Sempere, M. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms024 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Menstrual Cycle Effects on Insulin Sensitivity in Women with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
Trout, K. K., Rickels, M. R., Schutta, M. H., Petrova, M., Freeman, E. W., Tkacs, N. C., & Teff, K. L. (2007) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2006.0004 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Barata, D. S., Adan, L. F., Netto, E. M., & Ramalho, A. C. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2248 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Menstrual Cycle, Glucose Control and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Gamarra, E., & Trimboli, P. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13020374 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cawood, E. H. H., Bancroft, J., & Steel, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Steel, J.M.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 444-448
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2087150818
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- perimenstrual symptoms, premenstrual syndrome, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, blood glucose, glycosuria, menstrual cycle, age at menarche, menstrual irregularity, premenstrual depression, glycemic control
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Contraception, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dysmenorrhea, Female, Humans, Male, Menstruation, Middle Aged, Premenstrual Syndrome, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review