The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neutrophil Bactericidal Function in Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence for Association with Blood Glucose Control
Abstract
Neutrophil bactericidal activity was assessed in patients with type 1 (n=45) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=68) and non‐diabetic control subjects (n=40) by measurement of whole blood chemiluminescence. Though chemiluminescence values tended to be highest in the non‐diabetic subjects these differences were not statistically significant (mean ± SD) (2.73 ± 1.65 mV (controls), 2.33 ± 1.41 mV (Type 1 diabetes) and 2.38 ± 1.12 mV (Type 2 diabetes), F=1.12, p=0.33). Significant negative correlations were evident, however, in patients with both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes between chemiluminescence and glycated haemoglobin (rs=‐0.35, p=0.005 (Type 1), rs=‐0.45, p=0.002 (Type 2), fructosamine (rs=‐0.36, p=0.003 (Type 1), rs=‐0.42, p=0.004 (Type 2)), and random blood glucose (rs=‐0.25, p=0.04 (Type 1), rs=‐0.48, p=0.001 (Type 2)). Changes in whole blood chemiluminescence in a further group of 10 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus commenced on insulin therapy were followed for 21 days. Serum fructosamine concentrations fell significantly over this time (524 ± 58 μmol l−1 to 405 ± 47 μmol l−1, p<0.001), however, although chemiluminescence values tended to rise these changes were not statistically significant (1.01 ± 0.38 mV to 1.60 ± 0.91 mV, S=4.24, df=5, p=0.52). These results suggest that impaired neutrophil bactericidal function is associated with poor blood glucose control. While it is likely that neutrophil bactericidal function will improve as blood glucose control improves, further studies are required both to confirm this and to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of clinical bacterial infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Acute hyperglycemia and the innate immune system: Clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects
Turina, M., Fry, D. E., & Polk, H. C. (2005) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000170106.61978.d8 · Cited by 490
The role of interleukin-18 in the metabolic syndrome
Trøseid, M., Seljeflot, I., & Arnesen, H. (2010) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/1475-2840-9-11 · Cited by 155
Determinants of Candidemia and Candidemia-Related Death in Cardiothoracic ICU Patients
Michalopoulos, A. S., Geroulanos, S., & Mentzelopoulos, S. D. (2003) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.124.6.2244 · Cited by 121
ROS production in neutrophils from alloxan-induced diabetic rats treated in vivo with astaxanthin
Marin, D. P., Bolin, A. P., Macedo, R. D. C. S., Sampaio, S. C., & Otton, R. (2011) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2010.10.013 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallacher, S. J., Thomson, G., Fraser, W. D., Fisher, B. M., Gemmell, C. G., & MacCuish, A. C.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 916-920
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2081979358
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil Bactericidal Function in Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence for Association with Blood Glucose Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00396.x
- The paper
- Gallacher, S. J., Thomson, G., Fraser, W. D., Fisher, B. M., Gemmell, C. G., & MacCuish, A. C. (1995). Neutrophil Bactericidal Function in Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence for Association with Blood Glucose Control. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00396.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.