Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 551

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant α‐lipoic acid: a meta‐analysis

Ziegler, D., Nowak, H., Kempler, P., Vargha, P., Low, P. A.·2004·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims To determine the efficacy and safety of 600 mg of α‐lipoic acid given intravenously over 3 weeks in diabetic patients with symptomatic polyneuropathy. Methods We searched the database of VIATRIS GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany, for clinical trials of α‐lipoic acid according to the following prerequisites: randomized, double‐masked, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial using α‐lipoic acid infusions of 600 mg i.v. per day for 3 weeks, except for weekends, in diabetic patients with positive sensory symptoms of polyneuropathy which were scored by the Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the feet on a daily basis. Four trials (ALADIN I, ALADIN III, SYDNEY, NATHAN II) comprised n = 1258 patients (α‐lipoic acid n = 716; placebo n = 542) met these eligibility criteria and were included in a meta‐analysis based on the intention‐to‐treat principle. Primary analysis involved a comparison of the differences in TSS from baseline to the end of i.v. Treatment between the groups treated with α‐lipoic acid or placebo. Secondary analyses included daily changes in TSS, responder rates (≥ 50% improvement in TSS), individual TSS components, Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS), NIS of the lower limbs (NIS‐LL), individual NIS‐LL components, and the rates of adverse events. Results After 3 weeks the relative difference in favour of α‐lipoic acid vs. placebo was 24.1% (13.5, 33.4) (geometric mean with 95% confidence interval) for TSS and 16.0% (5.7, 25.2) for NIS‐LL. The responder rates were 52.7% in patients treated with α‐lipoic acid and 36.9% in those on placebo (P < 0.05). On a daily basis there was a continuous increase in the magnitude of TSS improvement in favour of α‐lipoic acid vs. placebo which was noted first after 8 days of treatment. Among the individual components of the TSS, pain, burning, and numbness decreased in favour of α‐lipoic acid compared with placebo, while among the NIS‐LL components pin‐prick and touch‐pressure sensation as well as ankle reflexes were improved in favour of α‐lipoic acid after 3 weeks. The rates of adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusions The results of this meta‐analysis provide evidence that treatment with α‐lipoic acid (600 mg/day i.v.) over 3 weeks is safe and significantly improves both positive neuropathic symptoms and neuropathic deficits to a clinically meaningful degree in diabetic patients with symptomatic polyneuropathy. Diabet. Med. 21, 114–121 (2004)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01109.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 551

Metadata

Authors
Ziegler, D., Nowak, H., Kempler, P., Vargha, P., & Low, P. A.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01-30
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
114-121
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2152045883
Cited by
551
References
6
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant α‐lipoic acid: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01109.x
The paper
Ziegler, D., Nowak, H., Kempler, P., Vargha, P., & Low, P. A. (2004). Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant α‐lipoic acid: a meta‐analysis. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01109.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.