Cited by 24Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Stepping through treatment: reflections on an adaptive treatment strategy among methamphetamine users with depression

KAY‐LAMBKIN, FRANCES J., BAKER, AMANDA L., MCKETIN, REBECCA, LEE, NICOLE·2010·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Stepped-care has been recommended in the alcohol and other drug field and adopted in a number of service settings, but few research projects have examined this approach. This article aims to describe a pilot trial of stepped-care methods in the treatment of methamphetamine use and depression comorbidity. DESIGN AND METHODS: An adaptive treatment strategy was developed based on recommendations for stepped-care among methamphetamine users, and incorporating cognitive behaviour therapy/motivational intervention for methamphetamine use and depression. The adaptive treatment strategy was compared with a fixed treatment, comprising an extended integrated cognitive behaviour therapy/motivational intervention treatment. Eighteen participants across two study sites were involved in the trial, and were current users of methamphetamines (at least once weekly) exhibiting at least moderate symptoms of depression (score of 17 or greater on the Beck Depression Inventory II). RESULTS: Treatment delivered via the adaptive treatment (stepped-care) model was associated with improvement in depression and methamphetamine use, however, was not associated with more efficient delivery of psychological treatment to this population relative to the comparison treatment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial attests to the potential for adaptive treatment strategies to increase the evidence base for stepped-care approaches within the alcohol and other drug field. However, in order for stepped-care treatment in this trial to be delivered efficiently, specific training in the delivery and philosophy of the model is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00203.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KAY‐LAMBKIN, F. J., BAKER, A. L., MCKETIN, R., & LEE, N.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
KAY‐LAMBKIN, FRANCES J.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
475-482
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W1522970367
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
stepped care, adaptive treatment strategies, methamphetamine use, depression, comorbidities, cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interventions, integrated treatment, treatment efficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Evidence-Based Medicine, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review