Cited by 51Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentTreatment of Major Depression

A review of treatment options for co-occurring methamphetamine use disorders and depression

Open access
Hellem, Tracy L., Lundberg, Kelly J., Renshaw, Perry F.·2015·Journal of Addictions Nursing

Abstract

Co-occurring methamphetamine use and depression interferes with treatment outcomes. Female methamphetamine users are known to have higher rates of depression than male methamphetamine users, although this is also true for the general population. There are limited treatment options for the management of depression among methamphetamine users. In this integrative review, we summarize data on treatment strategies for co-occurring depression and methamphetamine use disorders. English-language articles were identified from PsychINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and Medline as well as from reference lists of key articles. Search terms included "methamphetamine," "depression," and "treatment." Research articles describing psychological (n = 3), pharmacological (n = 6), nutritional supplement (n = 1), and psychological combined with pharmacological (n = 3) approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine use or withdrawal and/or depression are included in this review. Psychological and combination of psychological with pharmacological approaches have not been shown to be effective in treating these co-occurring conditions. Antidepressants have been determined to be ineffective and/or to introduce side effects. Gender differences with response to treatment were examined in only one of the published studies. There is a large gap in knowledge regarding treatment of co-occurring methamphetamine use disorders and depression. Considering that female methamphetamine users experience higher rates of depression than men, a focus on gender-specific treatment approaches is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jan.0000000000000058

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methamphetamine use, when regular, is associated with harms including injecting and sexual risk-taking behaviour, symptoms of mental ill health (psychosis, aggression, depression, anxiety), psychomotor, social and cognitive impairment, criminal activity, and sometimes death by overdose.

    “Methamphetamine (MA) is a psychostimulant that when used regularly is associated with harms such as injecting and sexual risk-taking behaviour, symptoms of mental ill health (eg, psychosis, aggression, depression and/or anxiety), psychomotor, social and cognitive impairment, criminal activity and sometimes death caused by overdose.1–7”

    From Protocol for a systematic review of psychological treatment for methamphetamine use: An analysis of methamphetamine use and mental health symptom outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract (page not provided) describes methamphetamine as a stimulant and lists depression and anxiety among the effects of abuse. The passages do not establish the other attributed harms: injecting or sexual risk-taking, psychosis, aggression, psychomotor, social or cognitive impairment, criminal activity, or fatal overdose. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hellem et al conducted a review on methamphetamine and coexisting depressive symptoms, reviewing nine studies incorporating psychological intervention only, psychological combined with pharmacological interventions, and pharmacological only.

    “Hellem et al 4 conducted a review on MA and coexisting depressive symptoms, reviewing nine studies incorporating psychological intervention only; psychological combined with pharmacological interventions; and pharmacological only, and found no research supporting one single treatment approach over others on either MA or depression outcomes.”

    From Protocol for a systematic review of psychological treatment for methamphetamine use: An analysis of methamphetamine use and mental health symptom outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results section identifies psychological-only, pharmacological-only, and combined approaches, and the Conclusion says no clear treatment model exists for co-occurring depression and methamphetamine use disorders. But the Discussion says the review yielded 13 publications, not nine; the Results also identifies a nutritional-supplement trial omitted from the citing sentence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hellem et al found no research supporting one single treatment approach over others on either methamphetamine or depression outcomes.

    “Hellem et al 4 conducted a review on MA and coexisting depressive symptoms, reviewing nine studies incorporating psychological intervention only; psychological combined with pharmacological interventions; and pharmacological only, and found no research supporting one single treatment approach over others on either MA or depression outcomes.”

    From Protocol for a systematic review of psychological treatment for methamphetamine use: An analysis of methamphetamine use and mental health symptom outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) says no clear treatment model exists for optimally managing co-occurring depression and methamphetamine use disorders, supporting the claim that no approach was established as best. However, the Results (page unavailable) describe 13 publications across psychological, pharmacological, combined, and nutritional-supplement approaches—not nine studies in the three categories the citing sentence lists. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellem, T. L., Lundberg, K. J., & Renshaw, P. F.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Hellem, Tracy L.
Venue
Journal of Addictions Nursing
Published
2015-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
14-23
ISSN
1088-4602 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326871892
Cited by
51
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Addictions Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-031247, K05DA031247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, depression, co-occurring disorders, treatment options, antidepressants, antidepressant side effects, psychological intervention, dietary supplements, gender differences, methamphetamine withdrawal
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antidepressive Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Amphetamine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review