Cited by 22Bone health and osteoporosis researchOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Patients on injectable diacetylmorphine maintenance have low bone mass: Low BMD in diacetylmorphine patients

Open access
DÜRSTELER-MACFARLAND, KENNETH M., KOWALEWSKI, ROLAND, BLOCH, NICOLE, WIESBECK, GERHARD A., KRAENZLIN, MARIUS E., STOHLER, RUDOLF·2011·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

Introduction and aims Risk factors for osteoporosis are prevalent in chronic heroin users who often start using opiates in their late teens. This study was the first to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in relatively young heroin-dependent patients on injectable heroin maintenance. Design and methods Using cross-sectional design, BMD was assessed in a convenience sample of 19 patients (mean age ± SD = 33.9 ± 5.4; 13 men) prescribed injectable diacetylmorphine for heroin dependence. BMD of the lumbar spine and proximal femur was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Substance use and menstrual history, psychopathology and risk factors for low BMD were assessed by questionnaire-based interviews. Results According to World Health Organisation criteria almost three-quarters (74%) of the sample had osteopenia (n = 11) or osteoporosis (n = 3) at one or more sites of measurement. All patients showed multiple risk factors for bone loss, with pack-years of tobacco use and years of heroin use reaching marginally significant associations with spine Z-scores. Moreover, BMD Z-scores correlated significantly negatively with increasing age at all sites, indicating that the older the patient, the greater the BMD deviation from an age-controlled population. Discussion and conclusions Prolonged heroin dependence appears to be associated with lower-than-normal bone mass already at early age and these individuals might be at greater risk for fracture with advancing age. The negative co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00242.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DÜRSTELER-MACFARLAND, K. M., KOWALEWSKI, R., BLOCH, N., WIESBECK, G. A., KRAENZLIN, M. E., & STOHLER, R.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-16
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
577-582
ISSN
0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1764597401
Cited by
22
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
heroin addiction, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, osteopenia, bone loss risk factors, tobacco use, fracture risk, opioid maintenance treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Heroin, Female, Femur, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Narcotics, Osteoporosis, Radiography, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review