Cited by 67Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCoffee research and impactsGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Why (not) alcohol energy drinks? A qualitative study with Australian university students

JONES, SANDRA C., BARRIE, LANCE, BERRY, NINA·2012·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Alcohol energy drinks (AEDs) are a recent entry to the ready-to-drink market, but there is an absence of research into the reasons young people consume these products and their consumption-related experiences. The aim of the current study was to investigate university students' perceptions of, and experiences with, pre-mixed AEDs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Four focus groups with undergraduate university students in a large regional city in New South Wales; with transcripts coded for key themes. RESULTS: Participants reported a number of benefits of AED consumption, many of which were similar to other ready-to-drinks, such as taste and image. However, the primary benefits of AEDs related to their capacity to wake the drinker up at the beginning of the evening and facilitate partying and drinking over a longer period. Many of the participants reported experiencing or observing negative effects from drinking AEDs, some quite severe, but this did not appear to act as a deterrent to their consumption. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Given the popularity and perceived benefits of AEDs-and evidence from previous research that their consumption is associated with increases in intoxication levels, risky behaviours and harmful alcohol-related consequences-there is a need to consider a range of strategies to reduce harmful consumption of AEDs. While educational interventions may be of benefit, there is also a role for regulation of the packaging and marketing of a product that is associated with substantial harms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00319.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2010, the FDA removed pre-mixed alcohol-energy drinks from the market because caffeine was determined to be an unsafe additive to alcohol, in part because it promoted excessive drinking.

    “In 2010, the FDA removed pre-mixed alcohol-energy drinks from the market because caffeine was determined to be an unsafe additive to alcohol,4 in part because it promoted excessive drinking (222).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [222]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JONES, S. C., BARRIE, L., & BERRY, N.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
JONES, SANDRA C.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
281-287
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2144227494
Cited by
67
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
university students, hazardous drinking, Australian university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Beverages, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Students, Universities, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Energy Drinks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review