Cited by 97Evaluation of Teaching PracticesSchool Choice and PerformanceHigher Education Research Studies

REAL COSTS OF NOMINAL GRADE INFLATION? NEW EVIDENCE FROM STUDENT COURSE EVALUATIONS

Open access
BABCOCK, PHILIP·2010·Economic Inquiry

Abstract

College grade point averages in the United States rose substantially between the 1960s and the 2000s. Over the same period, study time declined by almost a half. This paper uses a 12‐quarter panel of course evaluations from the University of California, San Diego to discern whether a link between grades and effort investment holds up in a micro setting. Results indicate that average study time would be about 50% lower in a class in which the average expected grade was an “A” than in the same course taught by the same instructor in which students expected a “C.” Simultaneity suggests estimates are biased toward 0. Findings do not appear to be driven primarily by the individual student's expected grade, but by the average expected grade of others in the class. Class‐specific characteristics that generate low expected grades appear to produce higher effort choices—evidence that nominal changes in grades may lead to real changes in effort investment. (JEL I21, J22, J24)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00245.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Becker, W. (1982), "The Educational Process and Student Achievement Given Uncertainty in Measurement," American Economic Review, 72(1), 229-236.
  2. Betts, J. (1996), "The Impact of Educational Standards on the Level and Distribution of Earnings," American Economic Review, 88(1), 266-275.
  3. Bok, Derek (2005), Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More, Princeton, NJ: Princeton university Press.
  4. Cohen, P. A. (1981), "Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta- Analysis of Multisection Validity Studies." Review of Educational Research, 51, 281- 309.
  5. Costrell, R. (1994), "A Simple Model of Educational Standards," The American Economic Review, 84, 956-971.
  6. Figlio D. and M. Lucas (2004), "Do high grading standards affect student performance?" Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1815-1834.
  7. Hersch, Richard and John Merrow (2005), Declining By Degrees: Higher Education at Risk, Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Johnson., V. (2003), "Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education", New York : Springer.
  9. Lichty, R., D.Vose, and J. Peterson, 1978, "The Economic Effects of Grade Inflation on Instructor Evaluation: An Alternative Interpretation," Journal of Economic Education, 10, 3-11.
  10. McKenzie, R., 1975, "The Economic Effects of Grade Inflation on Instructor Evaluations: A Theoretical Approach," The Journal of Economic Education, 6, 99-105.
  11. Nathan, Rebecca. (2005), My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  12. Stinebrickner, R. and T. Stinebrickner, 2008. "The Causal Effect of Studying on Academic Performance," Frontiers in Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 8(1), 1868-1868.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BABCOCK, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
BABCOCK, PHILIP
Venue
Economic Inquiry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-14
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
983-996
ISSN
  • 0043-3640 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-2583
  • 1465-7295
OpenAlex
W2108518570
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 15
FWCI
42.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economic Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
grade inflation, student effort, study time, course evaluation, grade point average, expected grades, effort investment, grade expectations, university students, University of California, San Diego

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review