The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate‐driven simulation of global crop sowing dates
Open accessAbstract
Aim To simulate the sowing dates of 11 major annual crops at the global scale at high spatial resolution, based on climatic conditions and crop‐specific temperature requirements. Location Global. Methods Sowing dates under rainfed conditions are simulated deterministically based on a set of rules depending on crop‐ and climate‐specific characteristics. We assume that farmers base their timing of sowing on experiences with past precipitation and temperature conditions, with the intra‐annual variability being especially important. The start of the growing period is assumed to be dependent either on the onset of the wet season or on the exceeding of a crop‐specific temperature threshold for emergence. To validate our methodology, a global data set of observed monthly growing periods (MIRCA2000) is used. Results We show simulated sowing dates for 11 major field crops world‐wide and give rules for determining their sowing dates in a specific climatic region. For all simulated crops, except for rapeseed and cassava, in at least 50% of the grid cells and on at least 60% of the cultivated area, the difference between simulated and observed sowing dates is less than 1 month. Deviations of more than 5 months occur in regions characterized by multiple‐cropping systems, in tropical regions which, despite seasonality, have favourable conditions throughout the year, and in countries with large climatic gradients. Main conclusions Sowing dates under rainfed conditions for various annual crops can be satisfactorily estimated from climatic conditions for large parts of the earth. Our methodology is globally applicable, and therefore suitable for simulating sowing dates as input for crop growth models applied at the global scale and taking climate change into account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/210739 · Cited by 9,087
On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters
PRIESTLEY, C. H. B., & TAYLOR, R. J. (1972) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:otaosh>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 6,574
Mitchell, T. D., & Jones, P. D. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1181 · Cited by 3,822
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance
Willmott, C. J. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:scoteo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,736
Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002952 · Cited by 1,942
Potential impact of climate change on world food supply
Rosenzweig, C., & Parry, M. L. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/367133a0 · Cited by 1,891
Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M., & Fischer, G. (2004) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.008 · Cited by 1,806
New, M., Hulme, M., & Jones, P. (1999) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0829:rtcstc>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,795
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., & Döll, P. (2010) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2008gb003435 · Cited by 1,561
Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance
BONDEAU, A., SMITH, P. C., ZAEHLE, S., SCHAPHOFF, S., LUCHT, W., CRAMER, W., GERTEN, D., LOTZE‐CAMPEN, H., MÜLLER, C., REICHSTEIN, M., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x · Cited by 1,296
Self-citation
Cited by
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222463110 · Cited by 2,319
Self-citationYield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review
van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009 · Cited by 1,652
Leng, G., & Hall, J. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.434 · Cited by 729
Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally
Kuemmerle, T., Erb, K., Meyfroidt, P., Müller, D., Verburg, P. H., Estel, S., Haberl, H., Hostert, P., Jepsen, M. R., Kastner, T., et al. (2013) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002 · Cited by 381
LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description
(2018) · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Waha, K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Müller, C., & Bondeau, A.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-259
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W1487147273
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate‐driven simulation of global crop sowing dates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00678.x
- The paper
- Waha, K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Müller, C., & Bondeau, A. (2012). Climate‐driven simulation of global crop sowing dates. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00678.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.