Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF DISCOURSE IN THE CORRECTIVE TREATMENT OF LEARNERS' ERRORS1

Chaudron, Craig·1977·Language Learning
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The reaction of the target language speaker to the L2 learner's errors may play an important role in developing awareness of norms of correctness. Corrective feedback functions in different ways to guide the learner towards preferred performance. Based on the corrective portions of classroom interaction in French immersion classes, a model for this kind of discourse has been developed. Different types and features of correcting acts combine into a structural model that can describe actual corrective interactions for a given error or set of errors. Use of the model in description helps isolate ambiguities; it highlights special features of corrective interaction that are likely to be more effective in eliciting correct performance. The example of various types of “repetitions”, or “response modeling”, is taken to show which types appear to lead to more successful correction. The model may be of use to both teachers and students in learning to identify corrective techniques and to be sensitive to the function of various kinds of feedback.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Allwright Richard L., 1975, New Directions in Second Language Learning, Teaching and Bilingual Education
  2. Annett John., 1969, Feedback and Human Behaviour
  3. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1976.tb02673.x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1976.tb00861.x · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1976.tb00861.x
  5. Cathcart Ruth L., 1976, Paper presented at TESOL Conference
  6. Cazden Courtney B., 1965, Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar
  7. Chaudron Craig., 1976, Paper delivered at the Linguistic Circle of Ontario
  8. Chaudron Craig., 1977, Teachers' priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. Working Papers on Bilingualism/Travaux de recherches sur le bilinguisme, No. 12
  9. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1975.tb04722.x · DOI
  10. Corder S. P., 1967, The significance of learners' errors, Reprinted from IRAL, 5
  11. Corder S. P., 1973, Introducing Applied Linguistics
  12. Dulay Heidi C., 1974, Natural sequences in child second language learning, Working Papers on Billingualism, No. 3. Toronto: O.I.S.E. Reprinted from Language Learning, 24, 37
  13. Dulay Heidi C.andBurt Marina K.1974b.You can't learn without goofing: An analysis of children's second language errors. InRichards (ed.) 1974.
  14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50018-9 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-505850-6.50018-9
  15. Fanselow John., 1974, Paper presented at Eighth Annual TESOL Convention
  16. 10.2307/3585589 · DOI
  17. George H. V., 1972, Common Errors in Language Learning: Insights from English
  18. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1971.tb04612.x · DOI
  19. 10.3102/00028312010001021 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/B978-0-12-174950-7.50007-4 · DOI
  21. Naiman Neil, 1975, The Good Language Learner
  22. Paulston Christina B., 1976, Teaching English as a Second Language: Techniques and Procedures
  23. Politzer Robert L., 1965, Teaching French: An Introduction to Applied Linguistics
  24. Richards Jack C., 1974, Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition
  25. Rivers Wilga M., 1964, The Psychologist and the Foreign‐Language Teacher
  26. Selinker Larry., 1972, Interlanguage, Reprinted from IRAL, 10
  27. Sinclair J. McH., 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils
  28. Swain Merrill.(in press).L2 and content learning: a Canadian bilingual education program at the secondary grade levels. InBrière A (ed.) Language Development in a Bilingual Setting.
  29. 10.1080/00220671.1968.10883794 · doi:10.1080/00220671.1968.10883794
  30. 10.1086/460620 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/00220671.1970.10884051 · doi:10.1080/00220671.1970.10884051

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chaudron, C.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
29-46
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x
OpenAlex
W2001917795
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
20.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 10891 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.