The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A THEORETICAL MODEL OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING1
Abstract
A model of second language learning is proposed which attempts to account for discrepancies both in individual achievement and achievement in different aspects of second language learning. The model outlines aspects of the input of information through various kinds of exposure to the language, the storage of that information for the language learner, and the responses that are produced as a function of the stored information. The operation of the model is explained in terms of learning processes and learning strategies. The former refer to the obligatory relationships that hold between aspects of the model and are true for all second language learners. The latter describe a group of optional strategies that may be employed by different language learners and in different learning situations. Individual learner characteristics, such as language learning aptitude and attitude, affect the efficiency with which the processes will operate for an individual and the extent to which he will use the learning strategies. Illustrations are provided to explain how the model would account for performance on a number of different learning tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What the "Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us
Rubin, J. (1975) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586011 · Cited by 1,960
What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner?
Stern, H. H. (1975) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304 · Cited by 755
Formal and Informal Linguistic Environments in Language Acquisition and Language Learning
Krashen, S. D. (1976) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3585637 · Cited by 322
The Psychology of Second Language Learning
Dalbor, J. B., Pimsleur, P., & Quinn, T. J. (1972) · Hispania · doi:10.2307/339346 · Cited by 120
Cited by
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
“…facts about the language can be confirmed through introspection, whereas the distinction in second language research is usually based on whether a learner is able to articulate a rule of the language (Bialystok 1978, 1979, 1981b; Gregg 1984; Krashen 1979, 1981; Odlin 1986; Sharwood Smith 1981).”
BackgroundUnderstanding language teaching: from method to postmethod
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1658 · Cited by 854
Ritchie, W. C., & Bhatia, T. K. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50003-7 · Cited by 747
Learning Strategy Applications with Students of English as a Second Language
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., Küpper, L., & Kupper, L. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586278 · Cited by 687
Smith, M. S. (1991) · Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht) · doi:10.1177/026765839100700204 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Bialystok, E.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-83
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1975946463
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A THEORETICAL MODEL OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00305.x
- The paper
- Bialystok, E. (1978). A THEORETICAL MODEL OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING1. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00305.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.