The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ROLE OF ATTITUDES AND MOTIVATION IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: CORRELATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Abstract
This study investigated the multitrait‐multimethod validity of the Attitude/ Motivation Test Battery and in addition made use of laboratory procedures to examine the role of language aptitude and attitudinal/motivational attributes on the rate of learning French vocabulary. Subjects were 170 volunteers from an introductory psychology course. The results indicated that all but two measures adapted from the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery evidenced acceptable convergent and discriminant validity and that they were largely independent of social desirability. Indices of language aptitude and integrative motivation were independent correlates of indices of French achievement. The effects of language aptitude, integrative motivation, and mode of presentation on the rate of learning 25 French/ English vocabulary pairs were investigated using a paired associate learning paradigm. The results demonstrated that all three factors influenced rate of learning. Subjects high in language aptitude learned faster than those who were low, those high on integrative motivation learned faster than those who were low, and the rate of learning was more rapid under visual/ written conditions as compared with aural/oral ones. Other results indicated that subjects' perceptions of their effort and interest on each trial were influenced by their level of integrative motivation but not by language aptitude, suggesting the different roles these two factors play in second language learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest?
YOUNG, D. J. (1991) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05378.x · Cited by 1,041
Anxiety and Second‐Language Learning: Toward a Theoretical Clarification*
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00423.x · Cited by 930
Self-citationMethods and Results in the Study of Anxiety and Language Learning: A Review of the Literature*
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00677.x · Cited by 856
Self-citationConceptualizing Motivation in Foreign‐Language Learning*
Dörnyei, Z. (1990) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00954.x · Cited by 849
An Instrumental Motivation In Language Study: Who Says It Isn't Effective?
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009724 · Cited by 472
Self-citationTeacher Motivation Strategies, Student Perceptions, Student Motivation, and English Achievement
BERNAUS, M., & GARDNER, R. C. (2008) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00753.x · Cited by 366
Self-citationThe motivational dimension of language teaching
Lamb, M. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000088 · Cited by 361
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
Dewaele, J.-M., Botes, E., & Meftah, R. (2023) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190523000016 · Cited by 207
Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., Makmur, M., & Marzulina, L. (2018) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3013 · Cited by 165
Why autonomy? Insights from motivation theory and research
Ushioda, E. (2011) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2011.577536 · Cited by 161
SPARKS, R. L., PATTON, J., GANSCHOW, L., & HUMBACH, N. (2009) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716409990099 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-227
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2041070062
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.