Resolving Referential Conflicts in L2 Interaction: The Effect of Proficiency and Interactive Role *
Abstract
Extending the research done on the effects of different types of task and different participant arrangements used to foster negotiated interaction among L2 learners, we developed a task that presents specific referential conflicts and analyzed the solutions adopted within two different pairings of learners. Pairs in which the higher proficiency member had the dominant role engaged in little interactive cooperation and in some cases changed the task rather than negotiate a solution. Pairs in which the higher proficiency member had the nondominant role engaged in substantial negotiation work, sought each other's perspective and generally shared much more in the interactive turn‐taking and the successful resolution of referential conflicts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interaction may be influenced by the proficiency levels of the interlocutors.
“Interaction may be influenced by the proficiency levels of the interlocutors (e.g.Yule & Macdonald 1990;Leeser 2004).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Yule & Macdonald 1990
Cites
"Information Gap" Tasks: Do They Facilitate Second Language Acquisition?
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586546 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue
Leeser, M. J. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr134oa · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Proficiency pairing and engagement with language in L2 peer interaction
Zabihi, R., & Ghahramanzadeh, B. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102725 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yule, G., & Macdonald, D.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-556
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2002909692
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- second language interaction, negotiated interaction, proficiency level differences, turn-taking, task-based language learning, collaborative interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review