Cited by 32EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Proficiency pairing and engagement with language in L2 peer interaction

Zabihi, Reza, Ghahramanzadeh, Behnoush·2022·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2022.102725

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The result of Zabihi and Ghahramanzadeh's (2022) study is fully in line with the components of the interactional patterns construct.

    “The result of their study is fully online with the components of this construct on the ground that the level of proficiency can affect the level of engagement where high-high and low-low pairs can experience higher cognitive and social engagement than high-low ones.”

    From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Zabihi and Ghahramanzadeh (2022)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zabihi, R., & Ghahramanzadeh, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Neyshabur (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Zabihi, Reza
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
105
Pages
102725
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205738211
Cited by
32
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
peer interaction, second language writing, student engagement, emotional engagement, social engagement, cognitive engagement, collaborative dialogue, peer feedback, affective learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review