The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linguistic and Cognitive Correlates of Academic Skills in First and Second Languages
Abstract
Using the theoretical frameworks proposed by Cummins (1981a) and Bialystok and Ryan (1985), this research was designed to shed light on the relationship between cognitive correlates and linguistic skills in first (L1) and second (L2) language, and the extent to which performance on academic tasks in L2 can be predicted by these factors. The study was conducted with 73 Grade 5–7 children attending a bilingual English‐Hebrew day school. The test battery included a measure of intelligence, measures of linguistic knowledge in L1, measures of reading comprehension in L1 and L2 and static and working memory measures in L1 and L2. Evidence was found for the theoretical notion that with increased speed of basic processing in L2, higher level cognitive processes involved in linguistic and oral communication in academic settings are facilitated. Additionally, results suggest that children who can more systematically employ analytic functions in their L1 are more likely to do so in their L2 as well, and that performance on linguistically demanding tasks such as reading in L2 can be more accurately predicted with the aid of information on memory storage and executive control functions, in combination with underlying intelligence and L2 oral proficiency. Results highlight the important role that memory plays in performing linguistic tasks in L2 and help to explain underlying ability factors related to Cummins' interdependence hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
The concept of working memory: a view of its current state and probable future development
Baddeley, A. (1981) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90020-2 · Cited by 375
Cited by
Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis
Robinson, P. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x · Cited by 745
Attention and Memory during SLA
Robinson, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · Cited by 402
Chung, S. C., Chen, X., & Geva, E. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.003 · Cited by 203
Self-citationKeung, Y.-C., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2009) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.11.001 · Cited by 97
Orthographic and Cognitive Processing in Learning to Read English and Hebrew
Geva, E. (1995) · Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_18 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-42
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2133780168
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linguistic and Cognitive Correlates of Academic Skills in First and Second Languages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00171.x
- The paper
- Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and Cognitive Correlates of Academic Skills in First and Second Languages. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00171.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.