Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RISK TYPES AND INTER‐FIRM ALLIANCE STRUCTURES*

Das, T. K., Teng, Bing‐Sheng·1996·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

This paper examines the choice between equity and non‐equity forms of inter‐firm alliances from an ‘integrated risk’ perspective, which combines relational risk and performance risk in inter‐firm alliances. Relational risk relates to co‐operation among alliance partners, while performance risk has to do with the hazards of not achieving the performance objectives of an alliance, given co‐operation. We suggest that equity alliance is adopted to control relational risk, while non‐equity alliance is aimed at minimizing performance risk. Existing studies on the choice of alliance configurations are examined from the proposed risk perspective, and a number of key propositions are advanced for empirical testing and further development of the perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00174.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
827-843
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W2086710091
Cited by
494
References
5
FWCI
23.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.