Cited by 2,057Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsRisk Perception and Management

Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior

Sitkin, Sim B., Pablo, Amy L.·1992·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Past research has resulted in contradictory findings concerning the effect of risk on decision-making behavior in organizations. This article proposes a model that reconciles these unresolved contradictions by examining the usefulness of placing risk propensity and risk perception in a more central role than has been previously recognized. Based on this analysis, it is posited that risk propensity dominates both the actual and perceived characteristics of the situation as a determinant of risk behavior. Propositions derived from the conceptual model provide an agenda for future research on individual risk behavior in organizational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258646

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sitkin and Pablo (1992) suggest that the same scenario for a risk-taking decision, if framed negatively by stressing loss, leads to a higher chance of conducting the risk-taking behavior than if framed positively.

    “Consistent with the theory, Sitkin and Pablo (1992) in their study on risk-taking behavior, suggest that the same scenario for a risk-taking decision, if framed negatively to people by stressing loss, would lead to a higher chance of them conducting the risktaking behavior, than if it is framed positively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1992-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
9
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061960606
Cited by
2,057
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 85
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
risk-taking, risk propensity, risk perception, decision-making, organizational behavior, conceptual model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review