The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System*
Open accessAbstract
abstractDrawing on an analysis of critics’ reviews of Atlanta Symphony Orchestra (ASO) performances, we investigate how broader shifts in institutional logics shape the discourse of critics and their judgment of performances. We highlight how the aesthetic logic that traditionally informs the practices of the symphony yielded, in the face of declining orchestral resources, to a more commercially oriented market logic. As institutionalists have argued, shifts in logics are often catalysed by exogenous shocks. In the ASO, this blending of aesthetic and market logics became salient in the wake of a pivotal organizational event, the 1996 musicians’ strike. Qualitatively comparing pre‐ and post‐strike reviews of ASO performances, we find that the discourse of critics shifted to capture the changing logic of the symphony: post‐strike reviews were more attuned to market than aesthetic aspects of the symphony. Nonetheless, their reviews suggested that judgments based on notions of cultural authenticity were virtually unaffected. Although our results echo existing claims that art world critics often act in a ritualistic fashion, serving as gatekeepers for the authenticity of cultural genres, we extend scholarship by highlighting how critics’ stories are embedded in broader discursive fields that reveal how they patrol the boundaries of genres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Polanyi, K. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch4 · Cited by 6,208
Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5387 · Cited by 5,533
Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions
Friedland, R. J. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,555
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210361 · Cited by 3,232
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.
Perrow, C., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064777 · Cited by 2,704
Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore
Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096460 · Cited by 2,418
Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.188 · Cited by 2,329
Self-citationThe Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210178 · Cited by 2,143
Commensuration as a Social Process
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313 · Cited by 2,085
Cited by
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 · Cited by 3,519
Self-citationManaging the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431 · Cited by 1,571
Cornelissen, J., & Werner, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.875669 · Cited by 836
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00896.x · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1031-1055
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2045672877
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
- The paper
- Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System*. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.